Correct. Robert’s observations have not been finish related. My suggestion is that if a certain type of finish is used which is inherently more expensive AND if you’re still going to try to maintain some sort of lower price point, then it is reasonable to suspect that some compromises may be done elsewhere to compensate for the more expensive finish. It’s just a hypothesis.
Aside from any of this, the cost of finishing also helps explain why Gibsons are generally more expensive. It’s not the singular reason, but it is a real cost driver.
Keep in mind that the lack of a finish on the "faded" models was a price point issue.
And many of the frame components came from Vincennes, Indiana. From the supplier I work for. We supply TMMI in Indiana, TMMK in Kentucky, TMMTX in Texas, and TMMMS in Mississippi. Also, we have several sister plants all over the USA, and one in Canada.My 2011 Toyota Venza was assembled in Kentucky.
I love the finish on the faded models!Keep in mind that the lack of a finish on the "faded" models was a price point issue.
SO those robots (and people) build Japanese quality products on American Soil with American workers??? ............ hhmmm
Another example is the fret placement on my 2021 Gibson Les Paul 50's Standard. I found a tiny stripe of blue layout dye along the fret edges. This would indicate the fret positions were hand-laid, because if machined by CNC - as is the case with the Indonesian, Chinese and Japan builds - marking compound is unnecessary.
I see you went for a combo tolex... good compromise!
It's like buying a Fender. You can buy one made by Mexicans in Mexico, or one twice as expensive made by Mexicans in California.SO those robots (and people) build Japanese quality products on American Soil with American workers??? ............ hhmmm
Adding machines reducing craftsmen....improving constancy.....