Water anyone?

Some of you may be interested in what Nikola Tesla had to say about energy, frequency and vibration.

If you find that interesting, you may also find interest in Royal Raymond Rife.
 
For those of you with an open mind that have not already dismissed this topic, the Schumann resonance brings it all home with a frequency of 7.83Hz.
 
WavMixer said:
For those of you with an open mind that have not already dismissed this topic, the Schumann resonance brings it all home with a frequency of 7.83Hz.
Click to expand...

I have an open mind, but I haven't yet seen a shred of evidence suggesting that there's any method or mechanism by which an overall difference of 8Hz in music is going to have any influence on anything except the voicing of instruments themselves. Tension in strings, excursion of speaker cones, that sort of thing. As I understand it - and I'm not exactly an expert, but I know a little about the ionosphere from radio - the Schumann resonances are basically resonant frequencies in the magnetic field(s) of the Earth. I would initially assume that the frequencies would shift slightly depending on atmospheric conditions?
 
A little bit of knowledge is a good thing. I also am no expert in quantum physics and or quantum mechanics, however I do have a great interest in both and I can seecthe influence that they have in life.
 
Last edited:
I share your interests, indeed. However, I fail to see any connection between quantum physics and the chosen pitch of A above middle C? Likewise, I don't see any distinct relationship between quantum physics and Schumann's or Tesla's work. I think it should be added that while Tesla was undoubtably a genius in his own right, a lot of his work is purposefully misconstrued. After all, he mis-characterized a lot of what he did in order to ensure funding. It's very common to read about the 'free energy from the ionoshpere' that he was presumably capturing, when in fact he was merely converting electricity - and in such huge amounts that the funding for his projects was terminated.

Can you help to connect the dots here?
 
PelliX said:
I share your interests, indeed. However, I fail to see any connection between quantum physics and the chosen pitch of A above middle C? Likewise, I don't see any distinct relationship between quantum physics and Schumann's or Tesla's work. I think it should be added that while Tesla was undoubtably a genius in his own right, a lot of his work is purposefully misconstrued. After all, he mis-characterized a lot of what he did in order to ensure funding. It's very common to read about the 'free energy from the ionoshpere' that he was presumably capturing, when in fact he was merely converting electricity - and in such huge amounts that the funding for his projects was terminated.

Can you help to connect the dots here?
Click to expand...
To make a long story short, the human nerve system works by sending electrical impulses to your brain and vice versa. The signals are measured in frequency. Frequency is what ties these dots together. Each organ of the human body operates at it's own frequency. Yours ears have have a spectrum of frequency ranges they operate with or what you can hear. Your eyes have a spectrum of frequency range that they operate with or what you can see. Your heart has a frequency range that it operates within. To high or to low from the required range and you have a problem. Rife measured these optimal operating frequencies for the human body. Big pharma silenced his discoveries because they wanted to sell us chemicals. You can choose to subject yourself to chemicals that cause side effects sometimes worse than the issue they claim to cure.

I prefer to use more natural remedies for my medication. I'm diabetic and once given a frequency therapy, my blood sugar within the optimal range without injecting insulin for 48 hours. Just like playing a musical instrument out of tune is offensive to the ears, body organs running out of tune (frequency range) can effect their functionality.
 
Continued from above:

Frequencies can be beneficial to the human body as well as destructive. Please research the solfeggio frequencies for a more indepth explanation. None of the above statements are intended to be medical advise, I am not a doctor and offer this information as educational material for your research only. My experience with frequencies and diabetes may not produce the same results for other people.

They say that music soothes the savage beast. However there are also types of music that may effect people in a way to make them violent way such as the Juggalos with the ICP.
 
WavMixer said:
To make a long story short, the human nerve system works by sending electrical impulses to your brain and vice versa. The signals are measured in frequency.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, as I understand it (which is very limited), it's more like data being sent on certain events over a network. There's no carrier or bus frequency, though. I'm not a neurosurgeon...

WavMixer said:
Each organ of the human body operates at it's own frequency. Yours ears have have a spectrum of frequency ranges they operate with or what you can hear. Your eyes have a spectrum of frequency range that they operate with or what you can see. Your heart has a frequency range that it operates within. To high or to low from the required range and you have a problem.
Click to expand...

I'm going to have to disagree there; just because signals are outside our *very limited* ranges of sensory perception doesn't imply there's a problem. There are gamma rays shooting right through you and me in this instant and we're physically oblivious to that fact, yet they pose no problem in natural doses. We can't feel radio waves or a host of other things, either. I'd say we have organs for given parts of the spectrum because they result in capabilities that benefit survival. Eyes, ears, etc.

WavMixer said:
Rife measured these optimal operating frequencies for the human body. Big pharma silenced his discoveries because they wanted to sell us chemicals. You can choose to subject yourself to chemicals that cause side effects sometimes worse than the issue they claim to cure.
Click to expand...

I'm quite aware of big pharma, trust me. Rife's work has however never been replicated, never survived a peer review and is based on entirely unproven suggestions. There is no tangible evidence supporting any of it. That makes it dubious at best, given that it contradicts many proven concepts. I would not be surprised if big pharma shut him up, he wouldn't be the first. It also wouldn't inherently validate his claims either, though.

WavMixer said:
I prefer to use more natural remedies for my medication. I'm diabetic and once given a frequency therapy, my blood sugar within the optimal range without injecting insulin for 48 hours. Just like playing a musical instrument out of tune is offensive to the ears, body organs running out of tune (frequency range) can effect their functionality.
Click to expand...

Aye, if you can solve or tackle a problem naturally, go for it. It's normal to find two frequencies/notes that are out of tune with each other displeasing, sure. Isolated, it makes no difference to the vast majority of people. Only a tiny minority (mostly musicians, I would guess) would actually pick out a guitar tuned to 432Hz vs 440Hz. Play your A string and look at a spectrum analyzer. You'll see a span from waaay below 432Hz to way above 440Hz.
 
WavMixer said:
Just like playing a musical instrument out of tune is offensive to the ears, body organs running out of tune (frequency range) can effect their functionality.
Click to expand...
The conceit here is that there is only one natural and absolutely optimal frequency range, which is kind of ridiculous on its face.
 
Seamus OReally said:
The conceit here is that there is only one natural and absolutely optimal frequency range, which is kind of ridiculous on its face.
Click to expand...
Not sure where you got that impression. My comment was the difference between using 440Hz tuning as opposed to 432Hz which is a solfeggio scale.
 
Last edited:
PelliX said:
Hmmm, as I understand it (which is very limited), it's more like data being sent on certain events over a network. There's no carrier or bus frequency, though. I'm not a neurosurgeon...



I'm going to have to disagree there; just because signals are outside our *very limited* ranges of sensory perception doesn't imply there's a problem. There are gamma rays shooting right through you and me in this instant and we're physically oblivious to that fact, yet they pose no problem in natural doses. We can't feel radio waves or a host of other things, either. I'd say we have organs for given parts of the spectrum because they result in capabilities that benefit survival. Eyes, ears, etc.



I'm quite aware of big pharma, trust me. Rife's work has however never been replicated, never survived a peer review and is based on entirely unproven suggestions. There is no tangible evidence supporting any of it. That makes it dubious at best, given that it contradicts many proven concepts. I would not be surprised if big pharma shut him up, he wouldn't be the first. It also wouldn't inherently validate his claims either, though.



Aye, if you can solve or tackle a problem naturally, go for it. It's normal to find two frequencies/notes that are out of tune with each other displeasing, sure. Isolated, it makes no difference to the vast majority of people. Only a tiny minority (mostly musicians, I would guess) would actually pick out a guitar tuned to 432Hz vs 440Hz. Play your A string and look at a spectrum analyzer. You'll see a span from waaay below 432Hz to way above 440Hz.
Click to expand...
I have replicated Rife's frequency for pancreas and found positive results in my case. However y'all are free to pop your pills and brush your teeth with floride. Do not forget that more doctors smoke Camel cigarettes and the Fauci stab is good for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top