PelliX
Well-Known Member
Well, there's no disputing a difference there, anything from your own hearing to an oscilloscope will agree. Could you elaborate on which difference you're referring to?
Water anyone?
- Thread starter WavMixer
- Start date
Well, there's no disputing a difference there, anything from your own hearing to an oscilloscope will agree. Could you elaborate on which difference you're referring to?
OP
The difference on how the different tuning effects the human body.
PelliX
Well-Known Member
I have an open mind, but I haven't yet seen a shred of evidence suggesting that there's any method or mechanism by which an overall difference of 8Hz in music is going to have any influence on anything except the voicing of instruments themselves. Tension in strings, excursion of speaker cones, that sort of thing. As I understand it - and I'm not exactly an expert, but I know a little about the ionosphere from radio - the Schumann resonances are basically resonant frequencies in the magnetic field(s) of the Earth. I would initially assume that the frequencies would shift slightly depending on atmospheric conditions?
PelliX
Well-Known Member
I share your interests, indeed. However, I fail to see any connection between quantum physics and the chosen pitch of A above middle C? Likewise, I don't see any distinct relationship between quantum physics and Schumann's or Tesla's work. I think it should be added that while Tesla was undoubtably a genius in his own right, a lot of his work is purposefully misconstrued. After all, he mis-characterized a lot of what he did in order to ensure funding. It's very common to read about the 'free energy from the ionoshpere' that he was presumably capturing, when in fact he was merely converting electricity - and in such huge amounts that the funding for his projects was terminated.
Can you help to connect the dots here?
Can you help to connect the dots here?