Usually closest to the input jack....physically.
That's what it seemed like. I swapped a 12ax7 for a 5751 tonight. I tried both slots and it was the one next to the input jack that made the difference. Of course, I am assuming that a V1 swap is what is required for this replacement to matter.Usually closest to the input jack....physically.
Usually closest to the input jack....physically.
Yep, that is the one. It needed headroom. It did mellow it out.What amp? Panama?
That’s what I figured...you got the high gain model...but you dabble in pedals...need headroom for that.Yep, that is the one. It needed headroom. It did mellow it out.
Yep, that is the one. It needed headroom. It did mellow it out.
That's what it seemed like. I swapped a 12ax7 for a 5751 tonight. I tried both slots and it was the one next to the input jack that made the difference. Of course, I am assuming that a V1 swap is what is required for this replacement to matter.
This would have been a great opportunity to provide sound clips of the differences. I know you can do it... I know you like to do it! Come on, Bobby...With T12AX7 in V1:
View attachment 14096
With 5751 in V1:
View attachment 14097
Look at the gain setting increase, but with less audible gain, more presence and more clean headroom....EQ's slightly changed for the new tube...

This would have been a great opportunity to provide sound clips of the differences. I know you can do it... I know you like to do it! Come on, Bobby...![]()
Wow! That particular Marshall circuit is very sensitive to the differences of those two preamp tubes. On my moddified Carvin Vintage 16, the differences are more subtle but still very worth it with the 5751.Ok, the Von Herndon Doubleneck was used in making both videos - Bridge pickup is a Thro-Bak SLE-101 - wood spacer, Bridge 8.1K, long A2 magnet
First video is with T12AXC7 Genelex Gold Lion in V1, and TAD 7025WA's in V2, V3, & V4. NOTE: In this old video, I switch the Attenuator on and off. Switch 'Up' is attenuated and switch 'Down' is bypass:
I just shot this video about 5 minutes ago, with the JJ5751 in V1:
Wow! That particular Marshall circuit is very sensitive to the differences of those two preamp tubes. On my moddified Carvin Vintage 16, the differences are more subtle but still very worth it with the 5751.
Wow! That particular Marshall circuit is very sensitive to the differences of those two preamp tubes. On my moddified Carvin Vintage 16, the differences are more subtle but still very worth it with the 5751.
How did you know the 5751, and other tubes you experimented with, were safe for the amp?Every Marshall I have owned in the last 30 years ended up with a 5751 in V1. I found out about this trick by accident - I was given a box of 10 NOS JAN-Spec RCA 5751's in the late '80's (they actually came from the Naval Research Lab in DC when they wholesday switced over from any tube-powered testing equipment to solid state. Someone who worked there just grabbed a box of tubes and gave them to me. Half were things that didn't go in guitar amps but the other half were usefule). When my 800 started getting wonky and I knew one of the tubes was going I ended up sticking one of the 5751's in and playing around with the position (can't rememver now what sequence I tried things in) and when I ended up with it in V1 my mind was blown. Transformed the amp. I've done the trick on all the master-volume amps that I have owned since, except for the Mesas which don't seem to benefit from it.
How did you know the 5751, and other tubes you experimented with, were safe for the amp?