The actual name works, so it's easy to find which makes the measure completely useless (besides questionable).Try "the tone rooms (no spaces) dot com"
The actual name works, so it's easy to find which makes the measure completely useless (besides questionable).Try "the tone rooms (no spaces) dot com"
It's interesting how many years we have not only allowed linking to other sites, but encouraged linking to other sites. What are they afraid of?The actual name works, so it's easy to find which makes the measure completely useless (besides questionable).
I mentioned another amp related site, in the same way. It was not screened out.I concur on that point, while there are of course some security concerns for posting links with autopreview enabled and such, it's immensely handy to be able to do. Why are specific URL's blocked here?
Test: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0476/5297/files/valvemaster_rev_b.pdf?2274
Edit: Hmmm, OK, so it's specific URL's it seems.
Loss of ad revenue.What are they afraid of?
Technically, I didn't actually "ask for it".
I made a comment that "IF" I were to be banned, it would be easier to delete my browser link.
It was probably my whitewashing comment that earned me the "devisive" accusation.
I think Cross was looking for a way to silence the discussion about deleting posts that didn't violate any rules, but were posing questions they didn't want to answer.
In any event, my ban ends tonight at midnight.
Covert operations begin at 12:01.![]()
It's interesting how many years we have not only allowed linking to other sites, but encouraged linking to other sites. What are they afraid of?