Had I known, I could have picked up the 8200 when I dropped off the Ivanberg.




If that happen to me....
![]()
They make a little blue pill for that, Dono. or in Robert's case, Mrs Herndon!!!!!!ESD damage can occur years earlier and have a delayed failure, if it is indeed ESD damage.
They make a little blue pill for that, Dono. or in Robert's case, Mrs Herndon!!!!!!
@Don O, I love schematics, especially clearly notated ones.(From Don
"Well I couldn’t wait. So down to the studio I went. Fired up the soldering iron and got the first transistor out of the bag. Damn Newark sent a 2N3906 instead on the VN2410, sh#t. Good news is the second one was a VN2410 !
So I removed TR1 and soldered in the new one from the top side of the board. Used a little isopropyl alcohol to clean off the flux. Fired up the amp and, well no sound. That’s right no more white noise ! Your amp is back to working condition. I’ll mount it back in the cabinet tomorrow.
Here’s a few pics and a sound clip. It’s the lack of noise that’s the best part !!!"
View attachment 83227
View attachment 83226
View attachment 83224
View attachment 83225
Yes, the circles are the 2 gain pots. At least Marshall labeled them left to right on the front panel so VR1 is the clean channel gain and VR2 is the next one to the right and so on. First thing I did was to replicate Robert’s issue was just simply turning it on and inserting an input Jack which lifts the grounding prong in the input Jack. Could hear the white noise on both channels. So I used the o-scope to look at the power for the analog ICs and that was clean. I then injected a 1KHz sine wave and looked at it throughout the signal chains. Noisier than heck. Since the noise was on both channels it had to be coming from the very first gain stage area. I removed the sine wave and just stuck a plug into the input Jack. I then looked at R82 and the white noise was there. To me that indicated that TR1, the first transistor the signal hits could be defective.@Don O, I love schematics, especially clearly notated ones.
From your circled places, I am seeing a VR1 and VR5 = both Gain pots, correct? Then on the actual board, I always try to read a schematic, then find the designated part(s) in the PHYSICAL component within the circuit. SO<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< short of xray eyes to see part numbers on my computer screen, or a spec sheet with breakdowns of each part #, I am surmising you knew the spec by reading the markings on the TR1 and that TR5 is not in your pic of the actual board? Did you only replace ONE VN2410 and this fixed it? Or you needed a 2nd one because NEWARK sent a 2N3906 but not a 2nd VN2410?


Ahhhhh.... high school days!I need a pill that would do the opposite. Spontaneous errections can be embarrassing.
LOL AHHH 2nd grade ( Teacher) I was Hot for Teacher 12 years before Alex and Eddie showed their chops and 1984. Me Circa 1972 LOL.Ahhhhh.... high school days!![]()
Ahhhhh.... high school days!![]()
A lesson I learned very early on in my career designing circuit cards is re-numbering the components left to right and top to bottom after the card is laid out. You them back annotate the schematic and parts list accordingly. So when you are troubleshooting a card when looking at the schematic and having to find R27, instead of having to look all over the card you know right where to find it. Not many designers do that.
See how these components are easy to find…