problem solved -- and you save a CRAP TON-------
View attachment 37347
Ha!
Actually......no.
At a minimum, I want a two channel amp with an effects loop. I also like that each channel on the Mesa amps has its own EQ section, unlike many Marshalls, which often share the EQ, especially on their lower wattage amps. I realize this isn’t true of all Marshalls, but it's something to think about.
To be honest, I have been able to get good sounds from my Marshall DSL-5C, especially by running to an isolation cabinet. But, the longer I have it and the more I use it, the more limiting it seems as an amplifier.
Plus, I don't get the sense that Marshall really expected this to be used as a gigging amp. Again, I have been able to get, I think, really good sounds from it, but there is a pretty narrow range of what sounds good. There is a narrow range where I can get good clean tones, and a narrow range where my overdriven tones sound good without getting fizzy. Swapping a 5751 PI tube in for the stock ECC83 helped, but I think I'm just wanting a more 'grown up' sounding amp.
Mesa, on the other hand, seem to have taken their lower wattage amps more seriously. I don't presume to understand the actual corporate thought process, but my impression is that Mesa realized their lower wattage amps would be used in live situations, so they built them to be able to do that. The lower wattage Mesa amps seem to have as much attention given to their design and build as the larger models.
It is true. The Mesa amps are expensive, and I'll have to save for a few months to get one without impacting any other family budget considerations. I give myself an allowance, so I'll just keep socking dollars away until I can get an amp on the used market. But, sometimes the adage, "You get what you pay for," holds a lot of merit.