Gibson Burstbucker Pros Install:

Inspector #20

Ambassador of Tone
Fallen Star
Country flag
Picked these up from Reverb. I was surprised when I measured their resistance values. Gibson.com lists the Burstbucker Pro as Alnico V Wax Potted 8.3kΩ bridge and 7.4kΩ neck.

However, measuring them right now - at 77°F I am reading 9.2kΩ bridge and 8.4kΩ neck.'

Found this poking around on Sonny Walton's site:

"Another thing to note, I have seen some examples of pickups that measured considerably differently from their advertised DCR brand new out of the box. This kind of thing may not be common, but does happen sometimes. These effects are due mainly to more wire and turns affecting capacitance - but the DCR does go up with them, so it is an indicator. The ambient temperature affects the resistance measurement as well, roughly about 1% for every 5° F. Other things affect DCR, such as the wire stretching as it passes around the ends of the bobbin if wound too tightly. This effectively increases the wire gauge at those places.

Thoughts???

Burstbucker Pro Set.jpg
 
Last edited:
They sound good, like an SG should imho, and certainly suit your style of music well; that extra output, especially on the bridge puppy, will certainly be great for your style of playing. I'm undecided on whether I generally like these pickups or not, but they do sound right with that amp the way you're playing. (y)

Pickup surround on a batwing, hmmm... (n)
 
Not as big a fan of the SG's tone -compared to the Les Paul - but this has a great (huge .951") neck and these pickups are a great addition!!!

I have a Tele that I built that has a neck as big as ANY Les Paul. I put Joe Barden P'ups in it and it is NOT your typical Tele. Of course the Fishman Piezo bridge does add a lil sumpin sumpin to it also.
 
They sound good, like an SG should imho, and certainly suit your style of music well; that extra output, especially on the bridge puppy, will certainly be great for your style of playing. I'm undecided on whether I generally like these pickups or not, but they do sound right with that amp the way you're playing. (y)

Pickup surround on a batwing, hmmm... (n)

One thing I can say for sure, they are very, very bright - almost too bright - I had to roll off a lot of treble compared to the Alnico II's.

Makes me feel like Alnico II's are the way to go in my Gibson Les Paul.

Ok...

I got the idea for the pickup surround on the bridge after inspecting several of Angus Young's guitars.

225__1024x768_img_0627-518x768.jpg

On SG's, the pickups (with a Batwing) are never in alignment with the strings - they are always flat compared to the string's descending plane.

The pickup surround re-orientated the pickup go the string angle. Nearly all of Angus's SG's have the bridge pickup surround and the intonation screws facing rearward.

All of the Angus Young Signature SG's are built like this. Here is an image from Gibson.com:

23959ea2-eb31-402c-8d66-b0f4ca46d924.jpg

The first 50 produced were outfitted with Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates. Read more about this model here:

Gibson.com: Gibson Custom Angus Young SG Standard

In my case, when working on any SG, I always bend the pickup mounting tabs to tilt the pickup's towards the nut, so they are always aligned with the strings....

Here's a shot of my SG before installing the bridge pickup surround:

IMG_20170317_59111.jpg

At 4/32" from the strings, there's a lot of PAF sticking up!!!

I think it looks cleaner with the big surround....
 
Yep, you've made a good case for those surrounds. &, I thought those Burstbucker Pros sounded better than I expected thus the treble removal makes very good sense.
 
Back
Top