Your DD-3 might benefit from being fed a distorted signal, as opposed to feeding in to a distortion circuit. But, if it moves you that way...so be it. You might find your eq does some good work in the loop as well...but no fast hard rules for that one.All I have ever used is a CS-3, 7 Band EQ, DD-3 and NS-2. Never, ever anything else....may not make a difference.
Most of my dirt boxes are homemade
Yeah, I suppose that I haven't mentioned it here on this forum too much. I like learning to build my own stuff. Dirtboxes mostly...my 18watt superlite valve jr conversion...kits, or point to point...when I'm motivated, I'm happy with a soldering iron in my hand(I do love my Weller). I have a box of Rat making stuff beside me right now...and an unfinished trinity tramp(head to be) on my workbench. I'm probably going to finish a liteIIb baby will/valve jr combo or head(I haven't decided yet... I have a non working combo, and a working head...I need to decide what is going to end up where) before I get back to that though.Oh there is a gem of info. Do tell ! Sorry if I should know this already. My brain is so full, stuff is always getting pushed out.
Your DD-3 might benefit from being fed a distorted signal, as opposed to feeding in to a distortion circuit. But, if it moves you that way...so be it. You might find your eq does some good work in the loop as well...but no fast hard rules for that one.
My NS-2 always sits first(or second behind a tuner) in my chain. Most of my dirt boxes are homemade, and fairly quiet, so having the NS-2 shut the guitar signal down before the signal gets all blown out of proportion by a dirt box(or a noisy preamp channel) works for my needs.
If you don't use time-based or modulation effects, there may be no discernible advantage.
But, if you do use such effects, the FX loop generally yields a preferable sound.

In a situation like yours, the ns-2 is going to a: quiet any noisy pedals, and guitar signal. BUT b: it will also choke out any subtle delay tails that may fall below the set threshold...resulting in an unnatural sound. Maybe try tossing the delay in the loop...see if you like it, and can tame it.Hmmm...maybe I will experiment. This new album sill be recorded with all live effects.
I have, for over 20 years any ways, ran CS-3, GE-7, DD-3 and NS-2 in that order. My signal is really quiet because I never use a "dirt pedal." The only "distortion" I get is from the tubes alone
Let me ask this. Is the loop any quieter?
What happens when recording with amps with FX loops? And do the negative results only happen if there are effects in the loop?IThat said....I despise committing to fx laden instruments when tracking. There are almost always irreparable regrets.
In a situation like yours, the ns-2 is going to a: quiet any noisy pedals, and guitar signal. BUT b: it will also choke out any subtle delay tails that may fall below the set threshold...resulting in an unnatural sound. Maybe try tossing the delay in the loop...see if you like it, and can tame it.
I have also done my share of(albeit ammeture) recording over the years. I'm capable of recording up to 24 tracks at a pass, live, at 24bit 48k. My portable rig will do 16 tracks live at 24bit 48k. Most of my recording gear is a bit long in the tooth, but serviceable. I used to record demos for a few locals, from time to time...and my own band...but my talents are not worthy...or safe for social interaction.
That said....I despise committing to fx laden instruments when tracking. There are almost always irreparable regrets.
After the first instance of a musician that was insistent that I record "his" sound, with all the bells and whistles...even after I explained that I could take the raw sound, and run it through his fx rig after tracking a good performance, and mix to taste...he comes back to me during mix down, and asks me if I can kill a certain effect on part of a certain track...What happens when recording with amps with FX loops? And do the negative results only happen if there are effects in the loop?
and I have to say no. That's why I despise tracking wet. Since that time, I've learned to(quietly) set up a DI track for most situations if it's allowable.I have a lot to learn about recording, but it sounds cool!!After the first instance of a musician that was insistent that I record "his" sound, with all the bells and whistles...even after I explained that I could take the raw sound, and run it through his fx rig after tracking a good performance, and mix to taste...he comes back to me during mix down, and asks me if I can kill a certain effect on part of a certain track...and I have to say no. That's why I despise tracking wet. Since that time, I've learned to(quietly) set up a DI track for most situations if it's allowable.
So, I don't care if delay is out front, or in the loop...as long as it's off when tracking.![]()
There's a neat multi track recording app for iPad/iPhone (called multitrack DAW) that's fairly cheap, and crazy straight forward. Great for layered sketching, and remote tracking.Sounds like you are overtly modest in your description of your abilities.
Although I grew up in a recording studio, the technology was ancient. My current recording efforts have been put on hold, as we recently received custody of two kids from CPS, which necessitated an extra room. My oldest son has revamped Mom's studio and brought it into the modern era with a Audacity PC based recording software, but I don't get up there often enough to do anything with it. He recently gave me a server with Audacity installed in it for my personal studio. I have a good ear, but struggle with the modern recording technology. I make a few I-Pad videos every now and then for fun, but that's about it....for now anyways.
I may very well try my delay in the effects loop....and thank you for your explanation...
I've been a REAPER user since 0.86:dood:.I have a lot to learn about recording, but it sounds cool!!
I play with Studio One. I have done a 2 track recording. Problem is, I was he one playing the tracks!I've been a REAPER user since 0.86:dood:.
And I barely scratch the surface of that DAW.
I know, that type of situation is a PITA. It requires some forethought, planning, and a bit of top, and tail editing. You've got to give yourself enough time to get set after engaging the record button, and an audible cue to feed from. The pre-roll, and cue can be chopped off when you're done...I play with Studio One. I have done a 2 track recording. Problem is, I was he one playing the tracks!
I get it now....facepalm.Love me some BOC. Buck was a favorite when I was growing up, and beyond.Don't Fear the Reaper????
Love me some BOC. Buck was a favorite when I was growing up, and beyond.
Hmmm...maybe I will experiment. This new album sill be recorded with all live effects.
I have, for over 20 years any ways, ran CS-3, GE-7, DD-3 and NS-2 in that order. My signal is really quiet because I never use a "dirt pedal." The only "distortion" I get is from the tubes alone
Let me ask this. Is the loop any quieter?
His CS-3 is a compressor/sustainer pedalIt's not so much a question of which is quieter, it's a question of where in the chain to deploy your pedals for best effect. I'd say you are a prime candidate for using an effects loop, since your distortion is coming from the amp. In this scenario, you are introducing distortion (via the amp) after the delay and chorus. Try putting the chorus and delay pedals in the loop, with the delay last in the chain. The EQ pedal is a matter of taste. Some put them early in the chain...others put them later. I really can't say, as I don't own one and have never played around with it.
BTW, I do just what you do. I don't use any distortion pedals, aside from a Tubescreamer that I use to put a little hair on the clean channel of my amp. I have a small, 5 watt Marshall DSL-5C. I use it's effects loop all the time. I run to an external speaker in my isolation cabinet. With a mic in the iso-box running to the PA, it sounds huge. You'd never believe you're listening to a 5 wattt amp.