That is a good idea but to save effort, photograph the topside and invert it on your computer. Use Preview on a MAC and the menu allows for easy editing. Don't have to take the board with you to the desk that way.Nice work. You've certainly got to share a pic or two of the end result when done with it.
View attachment 111930
A rare dual collector transistor?
Another method I use besides the "image way" is to put a light on the bench and shine through the PCB from underneath. This works great with most dual layer boards.
That is a good idea but to save effort, photograph the topside and invert it on your computer. Use Preview on a MAC and the menu allows for easy editing. Don't have to take the board with you to the desk that way.
Transistor shown;
Tip121 Darlington.
It is the symbol for a Darlington transistor.

Of course, why didn't I see that!Sure, though for relatively simple circuits I tend to sketch them out by hand as I trace them using the light underneath to follow the traces without flipping the board all the time. When I have the pencil sketch, I'll recreate it nicely in KiCAD.
Yes, I see that; it's just the standard NPN transistor symbol. If you look closely at your screenshot or the section I highlighted, it seems there are two symbols overlaid. There appears to be what looks like a second collector, you can see the dangling line ends. Not that it matters, the schematic is clear, of course.
I just checked in KiCAD and my version is a bit older, but a TIP121 still shows as a real darlington transistor:
View attachment 111935
I hope they haven't changed that, would be a little confusing.
I think I will use standard regulators 7818 and 7918 for the supply to a pair of 2n3055 and MJ2955 transistors, to keep the power output similar but a better regulation.
The specification for the + - 18v rails are 8 Amps, so a pair of 2n3772, driven by a 7818 will suffice, and the opposite polarity for the other side.That should do the trick indeed. Assuming the current draw is fairly low as expected, you probably won't need much in the way of heatsinks, either.

I think it was overengineered, as I have never seen an analogue desk draw that much current!
I listen and play songs like this,
It wasn't me, Phew!It would have to be awfully large and have some auxiliary functions to warrant that draw indeed. Probably overspec'd which is not a bad thing, agree.
I can't really stomach the AI stuff. The idea is funny enough and even the lyrics would be passable as a pub song but it's just too 'canned' for me. Certainly understand the gist. My better half also has the uncanny knack to wait until the least inopportune moment to declare that "we" need to do something... such is life.
When we enter BDW93 into Kicad 10.02 this is what we get;
The same on ver 9.0 Odd isn't it. I was doubting my sanity for a moment![]()