mcblink
Ambassador of Riffs & Spliffs
The law would need to be rewritten to allow for a picture of the driver's face. It has been done this way before and currently still is in many places. In Washington however, as I understand it, it's not allowed. I could be wrong here as I cannot remember nor find the source that I originally read this, but I have some firsthand experience with my wife having received a ticket with a picture of her van running the light. She wasn't driving, not that it mattered, because the picture was taken from the rear of the vehicle and you couldn't see the driver. I was driving.That doesn't address the issue about the camera not proving that the owner was driving, or was that part of the "law needs to be rewritten" conversation? I imagine the car would need to be captured with the driver, but then it gets into the weeds with facial recognition issues to tie the driver to the car in the picture.
Honestly, I still think it's on the car owner regardless of how the capture is used. Either you trusted your car to the wrong person, or your car was stolen.
In the threatening mail she received, there WAS an option to name the driver...but we have the right to remain silent as well
Actually, thinking about this.....what if a truck and trailer made it through the light just a bit late and tripped the camera?
It takes a photo of the back of the vehicle....but usually, that trailer at the back of the vehicle isn't registered to the owner of the tractor pulling it...could be a port district's chassis with a shipping container on it, or any number of logistics companies...and even then, the owner of the tractor that is pulling it, is nearly never the guy actually driving it.
Where does that ticket go?
Who do they mail that to?