ibmorjamn
Ambassador of Moar Jammin
Man , Jones-n for the Page Dragon !
Very nice , thank you Fitz !
Man , Jones-n for the Page Dragon !
In my case my oldest Fender " guitars" are my 1989 and 1990 Am Std Strats.I like my Fender guitars newest one 25 years old oldest one 69 years old. Fender amps only collect pre 1984
I love that reversed logo !
Sell it to me cheap !
Can they be bought ?
I haven't owned a new Fender guitar in a while. Been probably somewhere around 15 years since I bought one, a Custom Shop Strat. Thing was shipped directly from Fender in Corona to my dealer in Redondo Beach and we opened it together. Out of the box there were drips in the finish and one of the fretboard dot inlays had popped. The setup was a bit wonky and the neck bolts were loose. Guys, this was a top-dollar CS guitar that got shipped a whopping 50 miles! I kept the thing with a discount for the finish and inlay issues but, that experience was for sure when I really started to sour on Fender, and as said it was the last I have owned. I have owned a couple of G&Ls since then and their stuff blows away anythhing Fender is doing these days, Custom Shop or otherwise.
(Sidebar: The Fender Custom Shop really irks me when I think about it. Fender guitars are widgets, designed to be mass produced by unskilled labor. Why does it now take a special department of the world's finest craftsment and luthiers to painstakingly recreate what a factory full of Mexican girls did in the '50s and '60s while they gossiped about what boy they liked? rant over)
I had a Princeton Reverb 3 or 4 years ago. It was OK but started to do some strange things after it had been on for a while that a tube swap didn't fix so I unloaded it. My Mark 5 had better "Fender" cleans anyway, ironically.
The problems coming out of Fender CS simply are unbelievable.
Dude, this was 15 years ago. I can only imagine theshow if I ordered the thing today. And this was a limited-availability guitar that you'd expect them to pore over before shipping direct to a dealer with a pre-paid purchaser.
I see no reason to badmouth Fender been playing this rig 38 years zero issues guitar and amp dated 7/1961
View attachment 87963
As in…. It’s been stated Gibson uses the same cheap pots in their upscale LP’s and SG’s that they put in their Epiphones.
That’s good to know since that’s not what I had read in a different forum….. by more than one person. Frankly. What you’re saying makes more sense.No, there are Gibson-branded pots in them, which are quite different from the cheap ones in an Epiphone. No, they are not splurging - they are good quality but not fantastic, and I find that I need to replace them (at least the volume pots) somewhere between 5 and 10 years, but they are much better than the cheap metric pots in an Epi. The Gibson Custom Shop uses a different pot than Gibson USA and they are really nice.
I think this sums up Robert's experiences. With the stumbles Gibson made in the last couple decades, I'd have thought that Fender might have done as much as possible to keep their house in order and ship shape in order to capitalize on the players who soured on Gibson. Now it seems that Gibson may have had a bit of a wake up call post Henry J, and kept better tabs on quality. At least Robert got a better instrument in his Gold top LP than he was getting in SG's or less expensive LP's.I haven't owned a new Fender guitar in a while. Been probably somewhere around 15 years since I bought one, a Custom Shop Strat. Thing was shipped directly from Fender in Corona to my dealer in Redondo Beach and we opened it together. Out of the box there were drips in the finish and one of the fretboard dot inlays had popped. The setup was a bit wonky and the neck bolts were loose. Guys, this was a top-dollar CS guitar that got shipped a whopping 50 miles! I kept the thing with a discount for the finish and inlay issues but, that experience was for sure when I really started to sour on Fender, and as said it was the last I have owned. I have owned a couple of G&Ls since then and their stuff blows away anythhing Fender is doing these days, Custom Shop or otherwise.
(Sidebar: The Fender Custom Shop really irks me when I think about it. Fender guitars are widgets, designed to be mass produced by unskilled labor. Why does it now take a special department of the world's finest craftsment and luthiers to painstakingly recreate what a factory full of Mexican girls did in the '50s and '60s while they gossiped about what boy they liked? rant over)
I had a Princeton Reverb 3 or 4 years ago. It was OK but started to do some strange things after it had been on for a while that a tube swap didn't fix so I unloaded it. My Mark 5 had better "Fender" cleans anyway, ironically.
I think this sums up Robert's experiences. With the stumbles Gibson made in the last couple decades, I'd have thought that Fender might have done as much as possible to keep their house in order and ship shape in order to capitalize on the players who soured on Gibson. Now it seems that Gibson may have had a bit of a wake up call post Henry J, and kept better tabs on quality. At least Robert got a better instrument in his Gold top LP than he was getting in SG's or less expensive LP's.