Yes... detailed gut shots. If any electrolytic caps are old or original, these have to be inspected closely and tested for leakage.Sweeeeeeet!
What no gut shots?
Gahr, consider the very real issue that the electrolytic power caps in that amp can short and fry the power transformer, and maybe cause a fire.
Old Caps need replacing unless this is to be a collectors museum piece.

I can't say I have noticed it on other amps, but I guess I'll have to check.Do you notice a difference in the sweep of your controls between guitars regardless of the amp?
I do. I always sweep the knobs once i get plugged in and settled to remind me how the sweep feels.
Could be your taper happens quick on the DT.
I wouldn't really care either, but here the drop is so dramatic that the pot almost loses it's function in dialing in a nice tone. It is either full on or really low after it is turned below 8-9. Would that be different if I were to change it to a linear pot?It does: the linear vs. log sweeps are perceived differently by our ears.
Supposedly, the log sweeps sounds more even for volume and the linear for tone but everyone has their preference. The pot resistance value and value of tone caps will shape the way you hear it or where the most responsive part of the sweep is as well., or maybe just the frequency range, again I'm no expert.
Like I said I dont really care I just roll the pots around a bit when I pick up the guitar to get a feel, like where the clutch grabs when you drive some one elses stick shift car.
...but the first thing you notice when playing it is that it gives you more power when playing through the mic input instead of the instrument input.
Yep. Playing through the mic input is a lot nicer, actually.That's because microphones have a much lower output level than instruments. So, the Instrument input to is "padded" with resistors to attenuate the level going to the rest of the circuitry.
I did a quick test again. The large volume drop happens with the DT (500k audio taper/non-linear pots, 50s style wiring) when the volume is turned down past 9. However, it only happens when the tone controls are not on 10.The finicky volume sweep only happens with your DT SG and the Mic input of the Gibson amp?
How about the Instrument input?
Tone control maxed out?
Usually Log or Audio tapered pots are preferred for the volume control on guitars, because it does have a more even audible response regardless of what is seen on those data charts.
In 50's wiring, when backing off on the tone control, that'll reduce some of the gain to the amp. I have no experience with 50s wiring in combination with linear tapered pots. I wonder if the jumpy volume with the tone control backed down is a normal side effect. I certainly would have noticed this on my guitars, but I will recheck later.I did a quick test again. The large volume drop happens with the DT (500k audio taper/non-linear pots, 50s style wiring) when the volume is turned down past 9. However, it only happens when the tone controls are not on 10.
With my Faded Special (300k linear volume pots, 500k tone pots, modern wiring) this does not occur. Neither does it happen with my Future Tribute (500k linear pots, 50s wiring).
Am I correct in suspecting that it happens with the DT because of the non-linear volume pots?
Have you tried your Skylark plugged into a different speaker source?Will probably have him fix the treble thing too.
In 50's wiring, when backing off on the tone control, that'll reduce some of the gain to the amp. I have no experience with 50s wiring in combination with linear tapered pots. I wonder if the jumpy volume with the tone control backed down is a normal side effect. I certainly would have noticed this on my guitars, but I will recheck later.
Are sure everything is wired correctly with no sneaky shorts?
Have you tried your Skylark plugged into a different speaker source?