I also agree with the marketing as you say ..don't market "We sound like a tube amp". They should just roll with "Hey, we have digital amp that sounds pretty good". I think they run into a lot of BS with this unnecessary "tube amp" stuff when they still have "transistor" to get to with sound quality. The old "Just be yourself" would be great and ideal I think too. Don't set yourself up for rejection when taken another way you could really shine.
Proud owner of a Boss Metal ZoneThat was all Boss Metal Zone all day, every day. But they got a signature tone that influenced an entire sub-genre.
Ive often wondered what Leo Fender and Les Paul would invent NOW -- with all that we have
This is what Les invented to record 8 tracks........
View attachment 80694
I downloaded free software that can do that PLUS Aton more ..............
Its a wonderful time we are blessed to be in gear wise.........
This. I paid £50 for my 1966 Fender Princeton Reverb in 1983. I sold it for considerably more about 3 years ago...5. You were offered a stupid amount of money for it
I still have a Keeley modded MZ from back in the day. Does a great "cocked wah" sound for soloing.Proud owner of a Boss Metal Zone
I don't like that people continue to classify those of us who prefer tube amps as "purists" which seems to imply some sort of luddite-like thinking.
With all due respect your "opinion" is they arent there yet, (for you--personally) however -- do you own a fractal-- have you tried a neural? Do you have a Kemper? ---for many pro semi pro and home/beginner/intermediate players its all ready there, and its just fine... and they are happy.but is not there yet,

With all due respect your "opinion" is they arent there yet, (for you--personally) however -- do you own a fractal-- have you tried a neural? Do you have a Kemper? ---for many pro semi pro and home/beginner/intermediate players its all ready there, and its just fine... and they are happy.
Frankly sound is like art -- some like Picasso some think hes a hack-- others LOVE Monet-- good for them.
you like tubes only-- good for you, enjoy them
where the problem (and the arguments, pissing, moaning, throwing binkies out of prams) occurs is when some -- cant allow OTHERS --to like their Picasso and try and force them to buy a Monet ....
I don't think programming or software will be the be all/end all. Maybe if the correct types of user interfaces are involved. Though I have little experience with modern solid state/replicant type stuff, it seems like a redux of the eighties rack mount stuff. Great if you're in the same situation every day, but heaven forbid you want to tweak a tone knob. I think the people who are absorbed with pursuing this entire spectrum need to look at the fact that ears do not work with just 1s and 0s the way software does.Would be amazing to see what he would have come up with in the modern day. Digital has its own amazements so he may have went with that. Probably would have gotten into programming then to get them to do what he wanted. I'd bet that.
I dated a girl whos grampa was a big engineer as well and had TV patents. Money too but the kids kinda took care of that. Anyway, those old timers meant business.
He may have also meant that they can mimic a tube in an on/off sense, not really considering sound. Maybe. I don't know - wasn't there. Lol
Being a programmer, I guess it's just a matter of programmatically simulating a tube and everything that is involved in an amp for it to happen. I can't think of anything else that is really in the way for them to sound like a tube amp. This hasn't happened yet but still could some day. Digital does prove capable of being able to hold and transfer the sound though. I mean, look at what a tube amp recording we can get. Especially when the sample and bitrate are pushed into the HD ranges.
![]()