P90s??? ... I'm your huckleberry.
This might be embarrassing to admit, but that's a really American cultural comment, and I don't get it. I presume it links to the famous character/book, but not sure of the meaning - please explain, I need me some learning today.
How so? Spill your guts on this...
In my experience, a single P90, position as per the '61 style with slanted stopbar/bridge has a lot more going for it soundwise (bark, bite, width...) than the 63/64 style Specials with 2 pickups and the lightening bar. Now, I'm comparing here in two ways: 1) when I bought the Junior, I also tried out a Standard (2017) at the same time; 2) the Junior against the current Special I own. In both cases, the Junior Lorded it with ease, sonically. Ok, the 2017 standard had 57s which are far from my favourite (I like the 490/498T combo much better although the 57 in the neck is very nice; bridge 57, meh...), but this Special, and SG John has had a similar thought I believe, has bland sounding pickups.
You know the theory of the neck pickup magnets affecting the overall sound even when that pickup isn't 'on', and you know the theory of bridge/stopbar position and type... I suspect, a combination of these three elements mean the Junior has a different sound, and one that I personally prefer. I always think of the Special, the Who type sound, as a tad thin - as I say, that's why I bought the SD Antiquities.
Junior
See, we have to wait until a smart Scandinavian comes along to get the best answer!

&, that, Sir, is a beautiful Junior
here was the guitar for leads on Situation Critical song just posted
I really rate the SG faded - a great and affordable rock machine.
Even though I own all three, I really like Standards.
My 1965 SG standard has the same fingerboard as the other standard.
See, I knew this would happen, I feel inadequately endowed now...
Both fellas have so many lovely guitars.
&, if SG John says the answer is Standard then that's the answer, I'm selling the Special, never buying a Junior again, only Standards from here on in. Thread closed!
