I dont mind a cover if its done well. Doesn't even have to be a carbon copy as long as its done its in the vein and keeps the spirit of it. But this is just dreadfulBoooooooooooooooooo
write your own poop and leave classics alone![]()
You should set the quality bar bit higher budI dont mind a cover if its done well. Doesn't even have to be a carbon copy as long as its done its in the vein and keeps the spirit of it. But this is just dreadful
Hey, WE did a cover lolYou should set the quality bar bit higher bud![]()
Precisely! Its always more interesting and fun if you give it your own flavor. A dead ringer cover is, just the same thing but done much less talentedI would never want to hear a carbon copy anyways when I can just listen to the original. I like it when the players put their own twist on it like SRV does with Voodoo Child or Hendrix with Watchtower.
Cover is fine but it has to be close to original. Slight twist is great but if you butcher the song just like that woman did then NO.Hey, WE did a cover lol
Thats not really a cover since he is filling that position in the original band. For a cover band, playing at a local bar, yeah, you want to get close since that's usually why they hire you. But for Megadeth to do a Black Sabbath tune exactly the same way as the original would be pointless to me.
Im a sucker for them every time just to see if its a smash lol lots of times i get surprised completely by the unlikeliest of people doing a cover that just doesnt look like what they could manage but they knock it out of the park. One in particular that surprised me was Rick Astley ( yeah the Rick Roll/Never Gonna Give You Up one) doing an acoustic rendition of Foo Fighters Everlong. While im not a big fan of either ( Foo Fighters are ok i guess), it was a great example of someone going outside their forte and making a great track.I think what's going on with this band is a veiled attempt to get around copyright protection. If they transpose and rework these classic tunes enough they will not be subject to licensing fees or be given a strike by YouTube. And by the time you realize you don't really like it - but still listen for a bit - then you've already played through the majority of the tune which counts as engagement and technically a view. It's a clever end run around the rules and they get to use a famous song title for their video which will show up in search results.
I mean who doesn't at least click on these covers once to see if its interesting or not?