Water anyone?

WavMixer said:
BTW, I'm not sure what you meant by pure "D" horses**t, however if that stood for Democrat, I can assure you that I do not identify with either party. I do believe that the right wing and left wing are both parts of the same bird . That is as close to politics that I care to discuss. I don't believe in politics or political parties. What I do believe is that history is a set of lies agreed upon.
Click to expand...
“Pure D” is an old expression that means “undiluted.” Nothing to do with Democrats.
 
Seamus OReally said:
If you’re implying that my eyes are scaled over, let me assure you that my vision is fine. I’ve looked into everything from Fortean science to Scientology, and I am painfully aware than 99.5% of everything people “believe” is pure “D” horses**t, or “more or less comforting lies,” as Kurt Vonnegut said. But there’s no loss or division here, I don’t think… I just don’t want to engage in a discussion in which neither party is likely to agree or change their minds. I’m pretty sure of my worldview, and I’m certain WavMixer is, too.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure of, at this point of my evening, just exactly how to address this…other than…everyone has the right to their opinion…so let ‘em have it. Who am I to poop on the parade of another, if they’re not “parading” over me. Their view may not be in line with mine, but that doesn’t matter. What matters is that they dare think for themselves, and have the wherewithal to express it.
What would be really s#ltty is…a world in which we beat down these “fringe theories”…without respect…without any sense of empathy.
Does the line of thought physically grab you? No…it grabs at your sensibilities.
Those are yours. Thanks for sharing. Same to all.
I’m not “of the mind” to let others think for me, but I’m happy to make an effort to learn from others…or not.
I, however, value the ability to draw my own conclusions…while avoiding sullying the experience for others.

Edit: This is a mindset I strive for…not always something that I consistently achieve, I mouth off plenty…
 
Last edited:
WavMixer said:
I have replicated Rife's frequency for pancreas and found positive results in my case. However y'all are free to pop your pills and brush your teeth with floride. Do not forget that more doctors smoke Camel cigarettes and the Fauci ouchi is good for you.
Click to expand...

The problem here is determining the causing factor. First of all - I'm honestly glad if it works for you, that's the most important part. However, the placebo effect cannot be ruled out. While we can't scientifically explain it, it's very real. If you 'believe' that drinking water backwards from a glass will help - it may actually do so. I'm sure you're familiar with the concept. As it happens, flouride is vaguely good for your teeth and bad for bacteria - the key is what *kind* of flouride (and obviously in what dose).

WavMixer said:
Do not forget that more doctors smoke Camel cigarettes and the Fauci ouchi is good for you.
Click to expand...

Fauci has put himself on the wrong side of science (and more) many times. I think we're all clear on smoking in large amounts being unhealthy. That's a bit of a straw man, no? While the old saying holds true sometimes about 'an offense being the best defense' it doesn't really apply to healthy discussions generally.

Back to resonance and frequencies.

WavMixer said:
My comment was the difference between using 440Hz tuning as opposed to 432Hz which is a solfeggio scale.
Click to expand...

I had to refresh my memory on this, that's why I didn't respond earlier. I think there may be a misunderstanding here; the 'magic frequencies' are supposed to be 174, 285, 396, 417, 528, 639, 741, 852 and 963Hz. Assuming we're speaking in the context of musical notes as opposed to a function generator, the difference would be negligable; as I pointed out yesterday playing an A note at 440 or 432Hz will render an almost identical spread across the spectrum when observed. Until now there is exactly zero evidence suggesting that any of this solfeggio idea has been confirmed. We do, however, have some unanswered questions here, like just why we find particular major chords the most uplifting or specific minor chords the most melancholic. We haven't figured it all out yet, but sidesteps into what I would call the 'esoteric' area never seem to lead to any progress.

Seamus OReally said:
I just don’t want to engage in a discussion in which neither party is likely to agree or change their minds. I’m pretty sure of my worldview, and I’m certain WavMixer is, too.
Click to expand...

This is what the world needs more of; agree to disagree. I like to engage in discussion, some might even say debate. It provides me with new views and interesting (counter)arguments. I'm open to have my mind changed, but the evidence must be compelling. Politely declining from taking further part in the discussion is obviously fine, too.
 
PelliX said:
This is what the world needs more of; agree to disagree. I like to engage in discussion, some might even say debate. It provides me with new views and interesting (counter)arguments. I'm open to have my mind changed, but the evidence must be compelling. Politely declining from taking further part in the discussion is obviously fine, too.
Click to expand...
robert-redford-yes.gif
 
Just for kicks, if you own more than 1 guitar, try tuning one to the standard 440Hz and one to 432Hz. Play a few songs and record them on the first guitar, then play the same songs on the other guitar also recording the session. You should be able to hear the difference while playing, but listen to the recordings and see if you prefer one over the other. Many people find the 432Hz tuning to be more pleasant to the ears.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top