This should aggravate some of the TUBE LOVERS

Its' almost hard to believe how far we have come in the music technology world...

The main monitors at work. The JCM 800 that fizzled out is on the floor:

Rat's Nest Studio.jpg

My Line 6 HD-75 head replacing the out-of-order JCM 800:

received_4233386223370137.jpeg

"The Beast" a 600 pound isolation cabinet, hand built for the studio:

Isolation Box Rat's Nest Studio Small.jpg

The Inner-Workings of "The Beast"

Isolation Box Rat's Nest Studio - Inside View Small.jpg

The Prototype Roland Drum Kit at the studio:

Rat's Nest Drum Kit Small.jpg

"Decca Tree" microphone configuration at the studio

received_691150501470300.jpeg
 
We may have come a long way in technology but I would still much rather play, record, et on the old school stuff. It's very hard to beat the awesome sound of live, miked musicians, playing several takes to get it right, all being pumped thru old school analog devices and recorded on good ole tape. I've got a a full blown recording studio via software on computer - it's cool, it's nice, you can get decent sounds, but... I'd still much rather have the fun and joy and sound produced working in an old school studio any day. But, that's me and like I like to say - it's just music man, is there really and right or wrong way ??? If a person is enjoying playing, recording it, or just simply a listener/audience-member who is liking it - SUCCESS !!!
 
We may have come a long way in technology but I would still much rather play, record, et on the old school stuff. It's very hard to beat the awesome sound of live, miked musicians, playing several takes to get it right, all being pumped thru old school analog devices and recorded on good ole tape. I've got a a full blown recording studio via software on computer - it's cool, it's nice, you can get decent sounds, but... I'd still much rather have the fun and joy and sound produced working in an old school studio any day. But, that's me and like I like to say - it's just music man, is there really and right or wrong way ??? If a person is enjoying playing, recording it, or just simply a listener/audience-member who is liking it - SUCCESS !!!

That's certainly understandable...

To me, I see it like this. The 1927 Ford Model T was a great and nostalgic car. In it's day, it was cutting edge. But, I would rather benefit from the 90 years of technology that has passed since then and rive a modern car. I feel the same way about music. The "soul" is in the artist, regardless of the medium it is recorded on.

They used analog because it was the best that they had at the time, not because it was better. Remember, that the earmark of analog tape was scratchiness and loss. We can "downgrade" any audio recording on digital media to sound like an analog production, if the producer wanted too and many "vintage" style recordings are not done on archaic, analog equipment, but on digital media that is given an analog effect.

Once you get into the modern studio environment, you begin to realize the 'holy grail' guitars and amps are mostly just things people talk about. If you are paying for studio time, plus an engineer, you can't afford an equipment failure, and this is why tube amps are becoming a thing of the past in a recording environment.

Some places do still specialize in the old analog tape recording methodology. One of the best that I know of in this field is ES Studios in Glendale. They offer a $358.00/day rate for 8 hours of studio time and this includes use of any of the equipment/instruments that they have on-site. An engineer is an additional $30/hour. Their 'Studio A' features an Audient 32 Track ASP4816 analog recording console, plus 2" 24 track. It's as close to going back in time as you can get.

Some dudes insist on doing it the old way, and that's cool, but I am glad I am not working with 1,400 foot tape rolls and Echoplex machines anymore. I've moved past that.

In the studio world, if it don't make money, it don't make sense. :-)
 
Well--- Im looking at the VHT and thinking I could try it in there --TOO BE FAIR THIS IS A HYBRID w/ 1 tube-- and Im lazy -- and Im not taking the Lil Sexy OR the Blackstar aprt tonight -- so fuggetabout it ---

well here we go--

pull chassis-- pull STOCK RUBY 12ax7 (Cabana now gets a new one of them spring loaded tube covers I hate) -- LET THE TUBE BREATH BABY!!!!!----I digress--


So-- played -- the Ruby -- nice grit on full gain (not much though its very MELLOW clean platform)

here is a gut shot for you solder monkeys that like that stuff---

1598483199611.png


here is the JET CITY SS mosfet loaded little thingy installed
1598483264550.png

HERE IT IS GLOWING like a porch light in the RED LIGHT district ;)
1598483306197.png

I also tested a JJs tube I had lying about -- and
the verdict--------

the JET CITY SS replacement --- actually SOUNDED more gritty than either real tubes -- "broke up" earlier and more predictably ---

YES I know the TUBER GOOBERS will point out its NOT A REAL TUBE AMP --- but there was a NOTICEABLE difference between the 3 tubes
Jet City -more Gritty
Ruby middle gritty
JJs -- least gritty and BARELY gave any break up with the gain on FULL bore........

SO -- Im no electronical enginesmeer --- but I do know some "change" was heard and happening--
yes the JC runs cooler you can touch it and all while its glowing no heat

IM trying to SELL the VHT so the stocker went back in -----if I end up keeping it though the JC retro-fake-o-bake-o tube mioght just go RIGHT back in asI liked it the best of the 3

Maybe one day Ill plug it in the blackstar ..........

for now-- for what I have "in" it Im impressed-- and I would honestly like to try the "hotter" one
 
 

Man, looks like we got a good deal today. The guy seemed really nice too.
 
the JET CITY SS replacement --- actually SOUNDED more gritty than either real tubes -- "broke up" earlier and more predictably ---
... which you could already notice in the 1st video. As we did already learn: those thingies are JFETs followed by step up transfermers (and probably voltage dividers in the inputs 'cause JFETs cannot handle the input voltages of vacuum tubes).
JFETs actually have a similar characteristics to triodes - so the result is by no means a surprise.

So these products might be interesting for people playing around with the voicings of guitar amps, notably distorted ones. But others from that they cannot be viewed as serious replacements for vacuum tubes (they should actually draw more current from the rail which might become an issue in some situations). JFET-amplifiers can easily be built without those little transformers between the stages.

If You insert one or more of these devices into a tube amp, please check if the rail voltages remain correct.
 
for the record.............dicking about with a 100.00 VHT head is one thing -----
would I put these in a 6,000.00 Dumble? -- no
would I EVER OWN a 6,000.00 Dumble to put them in ---no ---that is a silly waste of $ -- but hey if thats your thing have at it ;)

and come on by th farm I got some prime grade "A" lawn fertilizer to sell ya by the # :)
 
for the record.............dicking about with a 100.00 VHT head is one thing -----
would I put these in a 6,000.00 Dumble? -- no
would I EVER OWN a 6,000.00 Dumble to put them in ---no ---that is a silly waste of $ -- but hey if thats your thing have at it ;)

and come on by th farm I got some prime grade "A" lawn fertilizer to sell ya by the # :)
Ha ha... There's no such thing as a $6000 Dumble!
 
Back
Top