mcblink
Ambassador of Riffs & Spliffs
The issue here is that they're taking a picture of the vehicle and not the driver or the occupants, as dictated by the law (obviously in this jurisdiction, cannot speak for others)Perhaps a contrary opinion, but I'm of a mind that until licensing standards are enforced at every level, anything we can do to discourage stupid is helpful.
I neither want, nor am i willing to afford, a cop on every corner. I really like the idea of people being responsible when they fire up the most dangerous thing most will ever use. So if asshats won't slow down in our neighborhoods, won't heed the basic rule, or simply ignore all the others...hell yes take a picture of em and send em a bill.
That said, I'm not a fan of a city relinquishing enforcement to a private contractor.
My jurisdiction may be different, in that a traffic cop is present with the use of photo-radar speed enforcement (about the only traffic enforcement that exists in Portland since citizen oversite was mandated (though not implemented yet) at the ballot box)...
And yes, been hit by both. My son, driving my car, rolled a photo stop and was ticketed by mail. Funny thing though...he takes after his mom, who is Asian, and I am not Asian. Her clearly Asian name and mine are on the title.
So when the ticket was sent out, with a photo of a clearly Asian male at the wheel, the for profit private corporation mailed it to spouse. Didn't look anything like her.
Both they and our city got a nasty letter accusing them of racial profiling. Along with a not very polite "FU, take me to trial you collection of butt holes." They didn't .
And I got popped by a photo-radar on my way to a local ER. Showed up for trial with hospital records. The assigned cop wanted to plea it down. I opted to take my chances. When I presented them to the judge I simply said that I was seeking forgiveness for a clearly exigent circumstance, not permission. She agreed and tossed it.
The cop was displeased. I didn't care. Though, had I known at the time that he was there when I flew by, I'd have stopped and sought help...I was bleeding all over myself and couldn't get it to stop...And American Medical Response doesn't always show up when called (as in this case).
As such, they cannot prove that anyone in particular was operating said vehicle at the time the photo was snapped.
It is paramount that the core tenets of our court system are not undermined; that they upheld with integrity, lest they fall apart and fail to work as designed.
In this entire nation, we are to be considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. This is an inalienable right we all possess.
I am all for the GOAL. At the end if the day, the goal is to increase the safety levels on our roads and intersections. Ultimately that's the end result these cameras aim to do.
I, too, want the same end result.
But I cannot support the way this particular endeavor operates. It undermines the very basics, it's blatant and it's brazen.....
Hard to believe that we Americans once went to war over a 2% tax on tea.