NMD!

smitty_p

Ambassador of Gearology
Moderator
Country flag
New Mixer Day!

I ordered this from Sweetwater a couple weeks ago.

Due to being backordered, I just got it today.

Many kudos to @Thatbastarddon for his input.

He and I have been messaging back and forth about mixers and we even talked about it on a couple Meeting of the Mindless Zoom calls.

As you can see, I've already been playing around with it!


Mixer.JPG
 
what is the "glowing" area to the left of the "AUX" master?????
does that thing have TUBES?!?!?!?!?
 
Update:

So far, I am really liking this new mixer. The USB interface is essentially a 4x4 IO.

If you just plug the USB into your computer, and set the Interface setting in Audacity to WASAPI, you can record all four USB tracks simultaneously. However, if you download the software/drivers from the Steinberg website, it sets the mixer IO to ASIO ( audio stream input-output).

Due to licensing restrictions, Audacity doesn't support ASIO, in its standard download. So, if Audacity is your DAW of choice, it's actually best to just leave well enough alone.

BUT, purchasing this mixer allows you to download and install Cubase LE. Cubase is a Steinberg product. So, now I'm starting to learn Cubase! It allows me to take full advantage of the ASIO functionality.

So far, I'm really getting a kick out of this little mixer.
 
got the misses one of these a couple years back.....seems to be working well.......I aint missed no meals anyways....
DOnt recall any "download" options -- rather sure it aint got no Whiffie (WiFi) as I call it -- no blue tooth either but it helps with my sweet tooth ;)
1591563411679.png
 
BUT, purchasing this mixer allows you to download and install Cubase LE. Cubase is a Steinberg product. So, now I'm starting to learn Cubase! It allows me to take full advantage of the ASIO functionality.
Reaper would work fine with the ASIO driver too....along with others.
 
Reaper would work fine with the ASIO driver too....along with others.

I was actually planning on getting Reaper when I started looking at mixers. I may still do that.

But, since I get a free download (not just a trial) of Cubase LE with this mixer, I figured I’d give it a shot.

Actually, I think I’m starting to figure some of the basics out with this Cubase.
 
I was actually planning on getting Reaper when I started looking at mixers. I may still do that.

But, since I get a free download (not just a trial) of Cubase LE with this mixer, I figured I’d give it a shot.

Actually, I think I’m starting to figure some of the basics out with this Cubase.
I certainly will not discourage you from using a perfectly good tool. I had Cubase 3&4 back in the day...perfectly functional DAW software. We all develop our preferences. :cheers: (y)
 
I certainly will not discourage you from using a perfectly good tool. I had Cubase 3&4 back in the day...perfectly functional DAW software. We all develop our preferences. :cheers: (y)

Funny thing is...I haven’t used enough DAWs to really have a preference!

I’ve only used Audacity up until now. Actually, that probably still meets all my current needs.

But, like I said, now that I’ve got a chance to use a more scaled-up DAW, I figured I’d give it give it a whirl!

What do you prefer with Reaper?
 
Funny thing is...I haven’t used enough DAWs to really have a preference!

I’ve only used Audacity up until now. Actually, that probably still meets all my current needs.

But, like I said, now that I’ve got a chance to use a more scaled-up DAW, I figured I’d give it give it a whirl!

What do you prefer with Reaper?
I haven’t played with Audacity in a decade. When I was playing around with it, it was still pretty primitive...much like Reaper was at the time. The difference that I saw at the time was that Reaper was developing quickly, and attentively. I remember having a couple of questions addressed by Justin(the developer) on their forum....problems were solved and addressed quickly. To me, this was an amazing thing. Like a guitar nerd building cheap but amazing quality guitars, and following up personally to verify satisfaction, and addressing any shortcomings. A certain strap maker(new to this place) comes to mind as having a, seemingly, similar model.
That‘s a big part of my Reaper preference. Another is the fact that they offer the “full version” to try/sample for free....all features open, and fully functional. There is no “LE” version that has watermarks(like some video software I’ve tried), or limitations of access to function(like some audio software/plugins I’ve tried). Their simple approach is; try it...if you like it, buy an appropriate license and support the growth of the platform. In 2006 to 2009, this was pretty forward thinking...no “dongles”...no “cracks” needed...go ahead and try it.
When I was first learning my way around software based DAW programs, I was using standalone recorders as my main, reliable, system of recording...I might toss a few tracks into one or another DAW program to mess around. Of all the programs I sampled, Reaper made the most sense to me. I was able to figure out the routing, the pan laws, the rendering, everything that I felt I needed from a software DAW was accessible to me in a logical(to me) package. I started at around version 0.86...by version 4.xx my XP machine was taken offline, but remained fully functional. I was happily running that version for years before I finally updated my studio computer, and my Reaper version(and license...they last for two full versions...I bought a ver. 1 license, and a ver. 3, when I went back after the new computer, they were at ver. 6 - I liked some of the new features, like native spectral editing, so I purchased an appropriate license).
So, I guess the reason behind my choice of Reaper is that I can use it pretty intuitively, and reliably figure out how to accomplish every DAW oriented audio task that I’ve come across for the last 10+ years.
If Cubase fits that description for you...enjoy it to the fullest!
 
Last edited:
Interesting observations, Don.

I may still download and install Reaper. This will be especially true if certain tasks in Cubase start to seem clumsy. So far, things have made sense. I have had to look up some instructions for certain tasks, but once I see how to do those things, it makes sense. So far, I've just gotten to the point of recording. The real test will be how easy it is to edit recordings. I haven't really gotten into that, yet. Audacity is pretty understandable.

Another test will be system resources. I don't have the most powerful machine, by any stretch, running this DAW. So, if Reaper is less demanding of a computer, I may jump over to that. I was fully prepared to pay for the Reaper license when I started looking at mixers.
 
Back
Top