Marshall Style 1987 Build, Which Choke?

@SG John - I really have mad respect for your comment about your tone. That's an awesome thing. I wish I could say the same things, but the competition here in L.A. is fierce and I have the cheapest toys on the schoolyard.

What are you guys - who are using the old tube amps - doing without an FX loop????


I've always used a simple rig, so I think I can comment on both at once. I always believed in dialing in an amp with the guitar's neck volume at 6 and tone knob at 8. With the JTM, I also jumpered the inputs. After that, I only use four pedals. A distortion of some sort, an overdrive, a delay, and a wah pedal. Everything is done with the guitar's volume knobs and toggle switch. By dialing in the neck pickup, I could get a really good snarl when I switched to the bridge pickup. When we were gigging back then, I had been using the same stuff for over ten years, and knew it quite well. I always tried to get the best sound as possible to cover up my lack of ability. Some people will argue my lack of ability, but I still really focused on having my own really good sound, and how it worked with the other guys in the band. We've had a few jams at the bass player's house, and I've let his friends use amps that I store there. He always warns them that I'm one of "those guys" who use the guitar knobs, so be careful turning on the amp. It might be louder than their used to. At this point, I would not know what to do with an effects loop. I've never owned an amp with one.
 
@SG John - I really have mad respect for your comment about your tone. That's an awesome thing. I wish I could say the same things, but the competition here in L.A. is fierce and I have the cheapest toys on the schoolyard.
The competition here was insane back then too. We were just trying to get noticed, and some recognition. The big guns around town then were Rich Gilbert of the Zulus and Human Sexual Response, JJ Rassler from the DMZ and Downbeat 5, Preston Wayne of the DMZ, PW4, and Time Beings, Crispin Wood of The Bags, Billy Loosigian of The Joneses and Willy Loco Alexander, Duke Levine, Asa Brebner, and many others. I was nowhere in their league. I was just trying to sound good enough to get a second gig at the clubs or get people back in the door again. Boston doesn't have the studio or label presence of LA, but we are close to NYC and you have to be good enough to play in the clubs in both cities (and everywhere in between), or they'll never let you back in for a second show.
 
Last edited:
I've always used a simple rig, so I think I can comment on both at once. I always believed in dialing in an amp with the guitar's neck volume at 6 and tone knob at 8. With the JTM, I also jumpered the inputs. After that, I only use four pedals. A distortion of some sort, an overdrive, a delay, and a wah pedal. Everything is done with the guitar's volume knobs and toggle switch. By dialing in the neck pickup, I could get a really good snarl when I switched to the bridge pickup. When we were gigging back then, I had been using the same stuff for over ten years, and knew it quite well. I always tried to get the best sound as possible to cover up my lack of ability. Some people will argue my lack of ability, but I still really focused on having my own really good sound, and how it worked with the other guys in the band. We've had a few jams at the bass player's house, and I've let his friends use amps that I store there. He always warns them that I'm one of "those guys" who use the guitar knobs, so be careful turning on the amp. It might be louder than their used to. At this point, I would not know what to do with an effects loop. I've never owned an amp with one.

Dude!!!!

I had to read that twice to grasp it, Man!!!! Holy Biscuits that's wild...I'm gonna be honest, Man..I don't think I could play, sing solo and process all of that that you are doing!!!!

I am a fool for good tone. If I am not thrilled with my tone, i won't play aggressively. I played a big event once and we were all on the Aviom using in-ear monitoring. The in-ear does NOT give you a faithful replication of what your tone sounds like over the FOH. It's super thin and tinny. You can play to it, and they have a click track going, so timing is not an issue, but I need to hear what the crowd hears to really feel confident and play my very bestest.

I've finally got things worked out to where I can hear my amp really well - even in the mix, and we can still hear each other. Part of that magic happens when we set everyone's stage volume to the same level as the kick drum. Small venues still require us to rely on stage volume. We do have a PA and the capability to mike everyone, and that is done for larger events, but everything now is a small, outdoor or sidewalk venue.

Ok, so I do things a little different. I don't like how my guitars sound with the volumes turned down, so my guitar controls are always on '10' regardless. Amp volume knob is between 7 & 8, which gives the best punch and bite of any other setting I have tried. ALL of my volume control is with the Boss FV30L Low Impedance Volume Pedal in the FX loop. This allows me to drop the amp volume to a whisper, but it is still snarling at wide open. I am always on "Lead 2" and I have never really messed with the "Lead 1" setting, because the guitar sounds really thin on that setting.

My TS-9, the Compressor, #1 EQ and noise gate all go into the FRONT of the amp. The FV30L, the DD-3 delay, the CE-5 chorus and the #2 EQ (flatlined so it gives only a 5-10db boost for solos) ALL go into the FX loop and they go in that precise order.

When I play clean, I switch off the TS-9 and switch the amp from "Lead 2" to "Green" channel. Clean playing is the only time I am riding the volume and tone knobs on the guitar. Most of the time this is on songs like Tom Petty's "You Wreck Me" or "Birthday" by The Beatles, etc.

I'm really, REALLY curious about trying to run with a home-built 18 watter. I mean, I could just run the guitar straight in, but our setlist is so varied....I mean we go from Def Leppard's 'Animal' to "Sweet Home Alabama," to "Dead Man's Party," to "Jolene," "Me and Bobby McGee," to Dwight Yoakham's "Fast As You," so I am literally all over the map sometimes.

I'm a little intimidated...
 
The only pedal in that lineup that might benefit going through an fx loop for the sake of clarity is the delay pedal. But that doesn't mean you can't get a good sound without an fx loop.

No doubt, I just wouldn't know how to do it. It would be starting over from scratch.

In the studio, we typically plug right into the floor and the producer pulls up a profile on Amp Farm and away we go. It's rare that a "real" amp is used in modern recordings these days, except when there is a specific request for it.
 
I had the Metroamp "zero loss" loops in two amps. I'd run an analogue chorus & carbon copy delay in the loop. I ended up taking the loops out because as Cadorman noted, the chorus & delay work just as well in front of my amps that didn't have a loop.
If you did build a JTM45 & wanted to encorporate a buffered loop Robert, I can thoroughly recommend one of the Metroamp zero loss loops. Designed specifically for Marshall & Marshall type builds (though can be adapted to any tube amp), they encorporate high voltage MOSFET buffers (send & return) that operate on "tube" voltages & are a totally transparent loop. Though they are not relay footswitchable they easily could be using something like a Hoffman Amps relay board & relay power supply board (powered from valve heater supply). Cheers
 
Last edited:
No doubt, I just wouldn't know how to do it. It would be starting over from scratch.

In the studio, we typically plug right into the floor and the producer pulls up a profile on Amp Farm and away we go. It's rare that a "real" amp is used in modern recordings these days, except when there is a specific request for it.


Is it rare that real amps are used in commercial recordings only? How about independent bands? Whether they are small labels, or self funded? At all the studios here in Boston, they are still using real amps. Most of the "signed" bands here are on independent labels, so I don't know how studios are booked by whatever is left of the major labels now. I know of a few artists on semi-big labels, but they choose to record at these studios because they have the cool toys. And, at the studios my friends either work at or own, they are still trying to get a killer first or second take with the band recording live. That's how I had always done it. The first or second take locks the guitar and drums, with the emphasis on an amazing drum track. If you're in a large live room with baffling instead of isolation rooms, you want the guitar and drums to be locked up, and get a stellar take between the two so that any cross bleed in the mics doesn't matter. All the tracks are keepers, so no one cares if you hear guitar in the cymbal mic, or vice versa. Then, if there are punches you need to do with the bass, it’s not a big deal as it’s been isolated.

For me setting up, it's always drums and band in the largest room. Guitars are in isolation, and bass is preferably always in isolation playing through an amp and DI. The only upside any of us see about Pro-Tools is that now we can set up as many mics and tracks as needed. Unlike when we recorded to 16 track tape, and had to mix down the drum tracks to two tracks from seven, the primary guitar to one track from three or four, and the two or three bass tracks to one. Then, wipe the original tracks clean, so that you can start overdubs. The last couple of times I was in a studio, my guitar sound was recorded with an SM57, Sennheiser 421, and some sort of ribbon mic on each of my JTM45 and DST30. There was a large partition between the two amps to cancel bleed, and then there were two overhead condenser mics to capture the natural reverb of the room the amps were set up in. The bass was recorded in a similar manner. We were all in the same room, and we had eye contact, and could see what we were all doing. For a couple of songs which were over six minutes in length, with extended jamming, we pulled it off in one take. Then, we went back after to layer in some rhythm guitar, twelve string, keyboards, Mellotron, and do all the real vocal tracks. But, the basis was still live, like we'd play it on stage.

The entire idea was to record a very alive sounding record. I know that several studios still work in that manner. A couple of friends of mine who are excellent engineers will only work this way. They'll do otherwise if you want, but they want that big live drum sound that is full of energy and excitement. You don't get that when layering tracks. I read an article a few years ago about why today's music sucks, and it's not about genres. It's about production. Modern recording with Pro-Tools, autotune, and the whole cut and paste mentality has created sterile, lifeless music that has no excitement. There is no tension created by one person who is either just ahead or behind the beat, or a couple of cents off with his tuning. You also don't get some of the other little nuances as ringing of a ride cymbal or other little things that trick one's brain into thinking they are in the same room as a band. Instead, everything is manipulated to be as perfect as possible, and losing it's life in the process. It also creates bad players. I really think that being able to cut and paste allows people to no longer be prepared, or know what they're doing. I've sat in on stuff to watch someone ask to cut and paste something instead of fixing all his parts, only to find out the tempo wandered too much and it was impossible.

This song was recorded as I mentioned above. It was at Q Division Studios in Somerville, MA. My guitar was my '69 SG Standard going into the JTM45 with a 4x12 (I forget which one, maybe theirs) and my DST30 (AC30 clone). SM57 and Sennheiser about a half inch away from the speaker, then a ribbon mic maybe a foot away from each. then there was an overhead condenser mic. The bass was run through an Oliver bass amp with 2 -12 inch speakers. I remember Rafi putting an AKG of some sort and a ribbon(??) mic in front of the cab, then also went D.I. Guitar and bass amps were in separate rooms, and we were both in the same room as the drummer, and I whispered the vocals so we could keep our place. The solo was part of the original first take, as all rhythm guitars starting at the break were added later, as well as the Hammond organ and Mellotron. At 8:02 long, I really didn't want to have to try to do take two.



Then, for this track it was a Hummelvision in Jamaica Plain, where George Thorogood recorded at for Rounder Records. It was a great live room to record in. An old speakeasy club. It was recorded on 16 track tape. We set up the guitar and drums in the same room with some baffling. The bass was in the only isolation room. This track was our "warm up" to get levels. The only take we did was good enough to finish off. Only some minor rhythm guitar and feedback was added, along with the vocals.



Then, my favorite of tracks we recorded at Hummelvision. One take, beginning to end. Again, rhythm guitar overdubs added later. This and the previous track were SG into JTM45 with a Blues Driver, DD-3 Delay, and Cry Baby.



I don't think I could work with a model or patch. Not at this stage of the game. I'd love to record something new sometime, and I have the studio and engineer worked out. Just need to get the guys I play with on the same page. Ideally, I'd love to record on a soundstage, and record like we were playing a large stage. The excitement would be there for an excellent recording.

Sorry to hijack your thread Chris.
 
Last edited:
Good work there, John.

I love the studio environment. I've played plenty of one-take arrangements, with everyone playing at once, but I prefer using all the tools available in a given studio to produce a superior product.

I love the science behind all the tracking and layering. My version of "All Along The Watchtower" was 54 tracks when it was completed.
 
Is it rare that real amps are used in commercial recordings only? How about independent bands? Whether they are small labels, or self funded? At all the studios here in Boston, they are still using real amps. Most of the "signed" bands here are on independent labels, so I don't know how studios are booked by whatever is left of the major labels now. I know of a few artists on semi-big labels, but they choose to record at these studios because they have the cool toys. And, at the studios my friends either work at or own, they are still trying to get a killer first or second take with the band recording live. That's how I had always done it. The first or second take locks the guitar and drums, with the emphasis on an amazing drum track. If you're in a large live room with baffling instead of isolation rooms, you want the guitar and drums to be locked up, and get a stellar take between the two so that any cross bleed in the mics doesn't matter. All the tracks are keepers, so no one cares if you hear guitar in the cymbal mic, or vice versa. Then, if there are punches you need to do with the bass, it’s not a big deal as it’s been isolated.

For me setting up, it's always drums and band in the largest room. Guitars are in isolation, and bass is preferably always in isolation playing through an amp and DI. The only upside any of us see about Pro-Tools is that now we can set up as many mics and tracks as needed. Unlike when we recorded to 16 track tape, and had to mix down the drum tracks to two tracks from seven, the primary guitar to one track from three or four, and the two or three bass tracks to one. Then, wipe the original tracks clean, so that you can start overdubs. The last couple of times I was in a studio, my guitar sound was recorded with an SM57, Sennheiser 421, and some sort of ribbon mic on each of my JTM45 and DST30. There was a large partition between the two amps to cancel bleed, and then there were two overhead condenser mics to capture the natural reverb of the room the amps were set up in. The bass was recorded in a similar manner. We were all in the same room, and we had eye contact, and could see what we were all doing. For a couple of songs which were over six minutes in length, with extended jamming, we pulled it off in one take. Then, we went back after to layer in some rhythm guitar, twelve string, keyboards, Mellotron, and do all the real vocal tracks. But, the basis was still live, like we'd play it on stage.

The entire idea was to record a very alive sounding record. I know that several studios still work in that manner. A couple of friends of mine who are excellent engineers will only work this way. They'll do otherwise if you want, but they want that big live drum sound that is full of energy and excitement. You don't get that when layering tracks. I read an article a few years ago about why today's music sucks, and it's not about genres. It's about production. Modern recording with Pro-Tools, autotune, and the whole cut and paste mentality has created sterile, lifeless music that has no excitement. There is no tension created by one person who is either just ahead or behind the beat, or a couple of cents off with his tuning. You also don't get some of the other little nuances as ringing of a ride cymbal or other little things that trick one's brain into thinking they are in the same room as a band. Instead, everything is manipulated to be as perfect as possible, and losing it's life in the process. It also creates bad players. I really think that being able to cut and paste allows people to no longer be prepared, or know what they're doing. I've sat in on stuff to watch someone ask to cut and paste something instead of fixing all his parts, only to find out the tempo wandered too much and it was impossible.

This song was recorded as I mentioned above. It was at Q Division Studios in Somerville, MA. My guitar was my '69 SG Standard going into the JTM45 with a 4x12 (I forget which one, maybe theirs) and my DST30 (AC30 clone). SM57 and Sennheiser about a half inch away from the speaker, then a ribbon mic maybe a foot away from each. then there was an overhead condenser mic. The bass was run through an Oliver bass amp with 2 -12 inch speakers. I remember Rafi putting an AKG of some sort and a ribbon(??) mic in front of the cab, then also went D.I. Guitar and bass amps were in separate rooms, and we were both in the same room as the drummer, and I whispered the vocals so we could keep our place. The solo was part of the original first take, as all rhythm guitars starting at the break were added later, as well as the Hammond organ and Mellotron. At 8:02 long, I really didn't want to have to try to do take two.



Then, for this track it was a Hummelvision in Jamaica Plain, where George Thorogood recorded at for Rounder Records. It was a great live room to record in. An old speakeasy club. It was recorded on 16 track tape. We set up the guitar and drums in the same room with some baffling. The bass was in the only isolation room. This track was our "warm up" to get levels. The only take we did was good enough to finish off. Only some minor rhythm guitar and feedback was added, along with the vocals.



Then, my favorite of tracks we recorded at Hummelvision. One take, beginning to end. Again, rhythm guitar overdubs added later. This and the previous track were SG into JTM45 with a Blues Driver, DD-3 Delay, and Cry Baby.



I don't think I could work with a model or patch. Not at this stage of the game. I'd love to record something new sometime, and I have the studio and engineer worked out. Just need to get the guys I play with on the same page. Ideally, I'd love to record on a soundstage, and record like we were playing a large stage. The excitement would be there for an excellent recording.

Sorry to hijack your thread Chris.

In general, we are seeing fewer and fewer bands using amps. Most of the bands that i know use amps only for live work. In the studio, it's all amp emulation.

Sometimes, an artist will request a certain amp or guitar to be used on their project and there are many studios who have vintage gear on site.

ES Studios in Glendale, California charges $385.00/day (8 hours) studio time and you can take your pick of the gear they have in stock. They have a Stratocaster there called the "Pawn Shop Strat" that is really remarkable.

Here's my take...

I don't want to burn up time trying to find the right amp or cabinet, or the right place in the room for it or the microphones.

The amp simulation is fast, doesn't break down and saves money too.

I've had people compliment my tone on my demos and they ask me to reveal all my tone secrets and I tell them its just a Blackstar and a fake Les Paul.

I've played through Tim Caswell molded Marshall's from SIR and they have been through Hell.

I will use my own amp sometimes on recordings, but most of the time, its more efficient to use Blue Cat Destructor or Avid and just plug into the floor.

You can't tell a real 2203 from the amp simulation, so I see no reason not to take advantage of the new technology...
 
Is it rare that real amps are used in commercial recordings only? How about independent bands? Whether they are small labels, or self funded? At all the studios here in Boston, they are still using real amps. Most of the "signed" bands here are on independent labels, so I don't know how studios are booked by whatever is left of the major labels now. I know of a few artists on semi-big labels, but they choose to record at these studios because they have the cool toys. And, at the studios my friends either work at or own, they are still trying to get a killer first or second take with the band recording live. That's how I had always done it. The first or second take locks the guitar and drums, with the emphasis on an amazing drum track. If you're in a large live room with baffling instead of isolation rooms, you want the guitar and drums to be locked up, and get a stellar take between the two so that any cross bleed in the mics doesn't matter. All the tracks are keepers, so no one cares if you hear guitar in the cymbal mic, or vice versa. Then, if there are punches you need to do with the bass, it’s not a big deal as it’s been isolated.

For me setting up, it's always drums and band in the largest room. Guitars are in isolation, and bass is preferably always in isolation playing through an amp and DI. The only upside any of us see about Pro-Tools is that now we can set up as many mics and tracks as needed. Unlike when we recorded to 16 track tape, and had to mix down the drum tracks to two tracks from seven, the primary guitar to one track from three or four, and the two or three bass tracks to one. Then, wipe the original tracks clean, so that you can start overdubs. The last couple of times I was in a studio, my guitar sound was recorded with an SM57, Sennheiser 421, and some sort of ribbon mic on each of my JTM45 and DST30. There was a large partition between the two amps to cancel bleed, and then there were two overhead condenser mics to capture the natural reverb of the room the amps were set up in. The bass was recorded in a similar manner. We were all in the same room, and we had eye contact, and could see what we were all doing. For a couple of songs which were over six minutes in length, with extended jamming, we pulled it off in one take. Then, we went back after to layer in some rhythm guitar, twelve string, keyboards, Mellotron, and do all the real vocal tracks. But, the basis was still live, like we'd play it on stage.

The entire idea was to record a very alive sounding record. I know that several studios still work in that manner. A couple of friends of mine who are excellent engineers will only work this way. They'll do otherwise if you want, but they want that big live drum sound that is full of energy and excitement. You don't get that when layering tracks. I read an article a few years ago about why today's music sucks, and it's not about genres. It's about production. Modern recording with Pro-Tools, autotune, and the whole cut and paste mentality has created sterile, lifeless music that has no excitement. There is no tension created by one person who is either just ahead or behind the beat, or a couple of cents off with his tuning. You also don't get some of the other little nuances as ringing of a ride cymbal or other little things that trick one's brain into thinking they are in the same room as a band. Instead, everything is manipulated to be as perfect as possible, and losing it's life in the process. It also creates bad players. I really think that being able to cut and paste allows people to no longer be prepared, or know what they're doing. I've sat in on stuff to watch someone ask to cut and paste something instead of fixing all his parts, only to find out the tempo wandered too much and it was impossible.

This song was recorded as I mentioned above. It was at Q Division Studios in Somerville, MA. My guitar was my '69 SG Standard going into the JTM45 with a 4x12 (I forget which one, maybe theirs) and my DST30 (AC30 clone). SM57 and Sennheiser about a half inch away from the speaker, then a ribbon mic maybe a foot away from each. then there was an overhead condenser mic. The bass was run through an Oliver bass amp with 2 -12 inch speakers. I remember Rafi putting an AKG of some sort and a ribbon(??) mic in front of the cab, then also went D.I. Guitar and bass amps were in separate rooms, and we were both in the same room as the drummer, and I whispered the vocals so we could keep our place. The solo was part of the original first take, as all rhythm guitars starting at the break were added later, as well as the Hammond organ and Mellotron. At 8:02 long, I really didn't want to have to try to do take two.



Then, for this track it was a Hummelvision in Jamaica Plain, where George Thorogood recorded at for Rounder Records. It was a great live room to record in. An old speakeasy club. It was recorded on 16 track tape. We set up the guitar and drums in the same room with some baffling. The bass was in the only isolation room. This track was our "warm up" to get levels. The only take we did was good enough to finish off. Only some minor rhythm guitar and feedback was added, along with the vocals.



Then, my favorite of tracks we recorded at Hummelvision. One take, beginning to end. Again, rhythm guitar overdubs added later. This and the previous track were SG into JTM45 with a Blues Driver, DD-3 Delay, and Cry Baby.



I don't think I could work with a model or patch. Not at this stage of the game. I'd love to record something new sometime, and I have the studio and engineer worked out. Just need to get the guys I play with on the same page. Ideally, I'd love to record on a soundstage, and record like we were playing a large stage. The excitement would be there for an excellent recording.

Sorry to hijack your thread Chris.
I haven't listened to the clips yet, but the info you posted here is very detailed and very valuable! This should be a "Sticky" of some sorts. Well done, John... :cheers:
 
Back
Top