Man going to the moon for the first time according to NASA

human123 said:
I think it's 99 percent lies, to cover the 1 percent truth.
Click to expand...
That's how the intelligence community works. Maybe more accurately, all the lies contain seeds of truth. Obfuscation is the name of the game.

That's why receipts are so important.

We have to parse verifiable fact from rumors, hearsay, and fiction.
 
Boubou said:
4 chan, LOL
Click to expand...
I know I know.

But there have been several legitimate leaks there over the years. For good reason too. Back then, it was the only truly anonymous place to interact. Not so nowadays.

Not sure I should admit this, but I've been there since about 2007 lol

I don't even see the trash anymore, just scroll right on by.

Jeez, I almost forgot: Epstein was also involved with 4chan. Specifically, the creation of it's perhaps most volatile board. Happens to be /pol.
That's not by accident, especially given all the things that board in particular is responsible for, let alone the other boards.
Maxwell was a longtime redditor and also a moderator there.

These people are far more insidious and also ingrained into everyday life than any of us want to believe.

4chan may have it's (deserved) reputation, but serious researchers understand it's significance, and it's pitfalls.

So we may laugh, and that's fine, but there's been far too much legit stuff to have happened there, and continues to happen, to discount it entirely based solely on the edgy teenage garbage that usually gets posted there.

Someone broke the news of Epstein's "death" on 4chan before it ever hit the news. It was posted well before the story came out in 2019. It was legit enough that it prompted the FBI to get involved and they confirmed that the poster was indeed a CO at the Metropolitan Correctionional Center.

This poster claims Epstein's body was swapped and he isn't even actually dead! Now THAT'S the kind of thing I want to dig into hard!

Go 4chan.
 
Last edited:
human123 said:
I think it's 99 percent lies, to cover the 1 percent truth.
Click to expand...
Pulling the 1% card out now, are you? This isn't the same as a simple political discussion about rich versus poor people.

My main concern has everything to do with the fact that it's possible that 1% of humans could actually be aliens. :ROFLMAO:
 
Sargeant Preston said:
Pulling the 1% card out now, are you? This isn't the same as a simple political discussion about rich versus poor people.

My main concern has everything to do with the fact that it's possible that 1% of humans could actually be aliens. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting the Men In Black movies are actually documentaries? That’s wild!! :rolf:
 
I'll give y'all my two cents worth.

We never went to the moon. Easy to prove that it never happened. The film-maker has openly admitted to making the scenes here on earth.

We didn't go this April fools day either, the rockets launching straight to the ocean, the easy to spot green screen glitches and ai edits are insanely easy to spot. 2 of the"astroNOTs" are actually actors.

Also the challenger space shuttle explosion killed zero astronauts, those folks are still alive and well.

I'll just shoot it to ya straight and true.
 
Headache said:
I'll give y'all my two cents worth.

We never went to the moon. Easy to prove that it never happened. The film-maker has openly admitted to making the scenes here on earth.
Click to expand...
In the context of the Cold War/Space Race...
What if these scenes had been filmed as a contingency, should the event that the real mission fail? Further, why wouldn't a rival/adversary have called BS in the years since, if the mission failed and the fake scenes were used instead?
Headache said:
We didn't go this April fools day either, the rockets launching straight to the ocean, the easy to spot green screen glitches and ai edits are insanely easy to spot. 2 of the"astroNOTs" are actually actors.
Click to expand...
I watched the launch and checked in here and there but didn't actually like, study anything. If we know that 2 of them are actors, which two were they? Why do we think they're actors?
Headache said:
Also the challenger space shuttle explosion killed zero astronauts, those folks are still alive and well.
Click to expand...
I've looked into this one enough to feel like there may be a "there!", there. As I recall, last time it was brought up it turned out to be a bit of a touchy thing lol
It is an interesting rabbit hole to be sure.
 
ibmorjamn said:
We can’t see further than the JWST limit.13 billion light years. That is how far light has traveled in this amount of time. Of course I looked it up because my brain could not quote it accurately .

“ There’s a hard boundary called the observable universe:

  • This is the farthest distance light has had time to reach us since the Big Bang.
  • JWST cannot see beyond this—not because it’s not powerful enough, but because no light from beyond that point has reached Earth yet.”
Click to expand...
en.wikipedia.org

MoM-z14 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

From Gemini:
"MoM-z14 (short for "Mother of all early galaxies") surprises astronomers because it is far brighter, more chemically mature, and more massive than existing theories allow for a galaxy that existed only 280 million years after the Big Bang"
 
Sargeant Preston said:
Is Heaven inside or outside of the observable universe? How long is the trip? I plan on packing a few sandwiches.
Click to expand...
What if it's local, it's right here, all around us and through us and our position in the cosmos, only we cannot perceive it so long as our consciousness is contained within our third-dimensional meat machines and it's experiential "sensors" or "receivers"?
 
iblive said:
Our little p-brains can’t comprehend infinity. In regards to an infinite universe…. We can’t comprehend space with no end. The thought that I’ve had is…. We actually get to the end of space. There’s a wall. Then I think. What’s on the other side of that wall. Yikes.
Click to expand...
 
mcblink said:
In the context of the Cold War/Space Race...
What if these scenes had been filmed as a contingency, should the event that the real mission fail? Further, why wouldn't a rival/adversary have called BS in the years since, if the mission failed and the fake scenes were used instead?
Click to expand...
The space race and assuming dominance as a world power was probably the reasoning for faking it.
I'll sum up some of the points as briefly as possible and y'all can look up the videos.
1. Stanley Kubrick came right out and said he filmed the entire moon landing hoax.
2. Buzz (astronaut) has said many times that you see it as it happened and never that we actually went there.
3. How did the rover fit on the rockets?
4. What did the moon Rover use for fuel? Batteries that weren't invented yet? Gas motor where there is no oxygen?
5. Who filmed the return ship that flew away from the moon surface?
6. Why are all the stars missing from every scene?
7. How did the president call the guys on the moon on a landline?
8. NASA says they lost the technology to go back..
9. How did we get everything perfectly correct the very first time?
It was all filmed in a studio, that's how.

mcblink said:
I watched the launch and checked in here and there but didn't actually like, study anything. If we know that 2 of them are actors, which two were they? Why do we think they're actors?

I've looked into this one enough to feel like there may be a "there!", there. As I recall, last time it was brought up it turned out to be a bit of a touchy thing lol
It is an interesting rabbit hole to be sure.
Click to expand...
Christina Kock the "astronaut" was in Mad Max 2 fury road movie
When you watch the launch footage you can see the 4 safety cages deploy and bring the 4 astronauts right back to the ground.



Here's one I just pulled up real quick.



Also look up Mars and Devon Island...
NASA is just lies, and lies, and lies..
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top