Hot Rodding a DSL40C???

Ok,

The TS-9 is a very cool pedal!!! It does boost the mids quiet a bit which I like and it also tames/tightens a lot of the loose bottom end, but the amp just doesn't sound 'right.'
 
Ok,

I'm playing these back to back and moving the TS-9 to the FX loop and back to the front of the amp with really no difference on the DSL40C. It really does improved the DSL40C's tone...but it thins out the VS265!!!!
 
Ok, so more adjustments and I got a pretty good tone out of the DSL40C. I am actually on Lead 2 with gain at around 10am.

Now here's an interesting thing...The 498T has a LOT of treble bite to it and the gold covered Epiphone pickups in the Replica have a bigger, more bottom end tone...Both sound good for different reasons, and both produce a good clean tone.
 
Now, here's and interesting comparison...

Even cranked very loud, the VS265 is very docile and controllable. Loud, but no tendency to feedback and become uncontrollable. The DSL is more difficult to control..
 
Ok,

I'm playing these back to back and moving the TS-9 to the FX loop and back to the front of the amp with really no difference on the DSL40C. It really does improved the DSL40C's tone...but it thins out the VS265!!!!

I would play around with it more in front of your amp. The idea of a Tubescreamer is to hit the input.

I will generally run mine with the gain around 12:00 or 1:00 and the level around 1:00 or 2:00. The tone is usually at about 10:00. Of course, that’s what works for my amp. You may have to deviate from that for yours.
 
I would play around with it more in front of your amp. The idea of a Tubescreamer is to hit the input.

I will generally run mine with the gain around 12:00 or 1:00 and the level around 1:00 or 2:00. The tone is usually at about 10:00. Of course, that’s what works for my amp. You may have to deviate from that for yours.

Currently running these settings:

DRIVE: 10am

TONE: 9:30

LEVEL: 1pm
 
So, the TS-9 really does tighten up the bottom end, and it does so with a pronounced mid hump and also a generous infusion of high frequencies. With a biting pickup like the Gibson 498T, this can be a little too bright and requires either EQ-ing or, at the very least, rolling off the bridge tone to about 7, which also dampens the string's response to pick attack and harmonics. However, pair that up with a mild mannered pickup - like a common humbucker in the 8-9k range - and it's almost a perfect combination.

I am currently using the TS-9 to boost the front of the amp in an already over driven state and the tone is absolutely divine when used as a clean boost. Driving the green channel puts you right into Angus Young territory, but boosting Lead 2 (gain @11am) with the Tone Shift 'in' for a slight mid scoop, but then offsetting that with mid EQ full up, gives you an almost perfect George Lynch tone as heard in 'Breaking The Chains.' Thus far, left-to-right TS-9 settings of '10-9-1' seem to be the best in terms of tonality, control-ability and overall sound quality

The brightness added by the TS-9 is welcome in most guitars, but in the case of the Gibson 498T, which is already a bright pickup, I've had to offset that a little to get things 'right' to my ears so to speak. When I switch guitars - from my 498T equipped 2016 Gibson 50's Tribute Les Paul - to my Les Paul Replica with stock Epiphone humbuckers - the tonal difference is really noticeable. The TS-9 makes a darker, weaker pickup really shine, adding mid and high frequency emphasis that you cannot seem to get any other way.

As much as the TS-9 works well with the all-tube DSL40C, it's not at all suited to a hybrid amp like the Marshall Valvestate VS265. Regardless of how you alter the TS-9 settings, the VS265 always sounds better, fuller and meaner providing it's own overdrive from a single 12AX7.

I suppose one would say that I am using the TS-9 in a most conservative way, and while it is true the TS-9 has a lot more to offer, I do not like the thinness and edge that higher drive settings produce, especially with higher output pickups, which do not need increased mid and high frequency emphasis.

The TS-9 seems ideally suited to weaker pickups, like the Gibson 57 Classic and Classic +. In my personal testing, I found the 57 Classic + measuring 9k to be very anemic in terms of its ability to produce a good 'metal tone' on its own accord. In fact, the 'Epiphone' embossed PAF style pickups in my Les Paul Replica - which measure 9.25k & 8.50k respectively - sound better in every aspect than my Gibson 57 Classic Plus. The Epiphone's are also quieter than the Gibson, far more articulate, especially when played clean and - quite literally - shocking. I wasn't expecting a $25.00 set of used Epiphone take-outs to literally destroy my brand new - $165.00 - Gibson 57 Classic Plus.

The Gibson 498T is in a completely different league and there are zero tonal similarities between the 498T and the Gibson 57 Classic or Classic +. The 498T is powerful, yet surprisingly articulate. It drives an amp into a very rich overdrive. In less than 1 year, I have used my 498T equipped Gibson Les Paul on over 500 recordings, including recordings for hire, and countless live performances and rehearsals. At this point, I would say that the 498T is probably the most versatile and well mannered pickup that I have encountered. It has far better manners - in terms of resistance to gain-induced feedback and clarity - than the DiMarzio and Carvin M22 Super Distortions and is about on par with the Suhr Doug Aldrich Set.

So, in this battery of testing, I have discovered more than just the effect of a TS-9 in general, but I also discovered something interesting about my guitars and amplifiers too. I would say the biggest surprise is the plain-jane 'Epiphone' embossed pickups without any 'CE' or 'RoHs' decals and only a single red and blue two-strand conductor. If you ever have the opportunity to try a pair of these pickups, I would encourage you to abandon the brand-loyalty prejudices and do so. The clean tones - especially in the middle position on a Les Paul - simply sound incredible...and it's a sweet-richness in tone that my 498T/496R simply cannot match.

This weekend, I will conduct more testing - at much higher volumes - and hopefully record some sound clips for you all to hear and enjoy.
 
So, the TS-9 really does tighten up the bottom end, and it does so with a pronounced mid hump and also a generous infusion of high frequencies. With a biting pickup like the Gibson 498T, this can be a little too bright and requires either EQ-ing or, at the very least, rolling off the bridge tone to about 7, which also dampens the string's response to pick attack and harmonics. However, pair that up with a mild mannered pickup - like a common humbucker in the 8-9k range - and it's almost a perfect combination.

I am currently using the TS-9 to boost the front of the amp in an already over driven state and the tone is absolutely divine when used as a clean boost. Driving the green channel puts you right into Angus Young territory, but boosting Lead 2 (gain @11am) with the Tone Shift 'in' for a slight mid scoop, but then offsetting that with mid EQ full up, gives you an almost perfect George Lynch tone as heard in 'Breaking The Chains.' Thus far, left-to-right TS-9 settings of '10-9-1' seem to be the best in terms of tonality, control-ability and overall sound quality

The brightness added by the TS-9 is welcome in most guitars, but in the case of the Gibson 498T, which is already a bright pickup, I've had to offset that a little to get things 'right' to my ears so to speak. When I switch guitars - from my 498T equipped 2016 Gibson 50's Tribute Les Paul - to my Les Paul Replica with stock Epiphone humbuckers - the tonal difference is really noticeable. The TS-9 makes a darker, weaker pickup really shine, adding mid and high frequency emphasis that you cannot seem to get any other way.

As much as the TS-9 works well with the all-tube DSL40C, it's not at all suited to a hybrid amp like the Marshall Valvestate VS265. Regardless of how you alter the TS-9 settings, the VS265 always sounds better, fuller and meaner providing it's own overdrive from a single 12AX7.

I suppose one would say that I am using the TS-9 in a most conservative way, and while it is true the TS-9 has a lot more to offer, I do not like the thinness and edge that higher drive settings produce, especially with higher output pickups, which do not need increased mid and high frequency emphasis.

The TS-9 seems ideally suited to weaker pickups, like the Gibson 57 Classic and Classic +. In my personal testing, I found the 57 Classic + measuring 9k to be very anemic in terms of its ability to produce a good 'metal tone' on its own accord. In fact, the 'Epiphone' embossed PAF style pickups in my Les Paul Replica - which measure 9.25k & 8.50k respectively - sound better in every aspect than my Gibson 57 Classic Plus. The Epiphone's are also quieter than the Gibson, far more articulate, especially when played clean and - quite literally - shocking. I wasn't expecting a $25.00 set of used Epiphone take-outs to literally destroy my brand new - $165.00 - Gibson 57 Classic Plus.

The Gibson 498T is in a completely different league and there are zero tonal similarities between the 498T and the Gibson 57 Classic or Classic +. The 498T is powerful, yet surprisingly articulate. It drives an amp into a very rich overdrive. In less than 1 year, I have used my 498T equipped Gibson Les Paul on over 500 recordings, including recordings for hire, and countless live performances and rehearsals. At this point, I would say that the 498T is probably the most versatile and well mannered pickup that I have encountered. It has far better manners - in terms of resistance to gain-induced feedback and clarity - than the DiMarzio and Carvin M22 Super Distortions and is about on par with the Suhr Doug Aldrich Set.

So, in this battery of testing, I have discovered more than just the effect of a TS-9 in general, but I also discovered something interesting about my guitars and amplifiers too. I would say the biggest surprise is the plain-jane 'Epiphone' embossed pickups without any 'CE' or 'RoHs' decals and only a single red and blue two-strand conductor. If you ever have the opportunity to try a pair of these pickups, I would encourage you to abandon the brand-loyalty prejudices and do so. The clean tones - especially in the middle position on a Les Paul - simply sound incredible...and it's a sweet-richness in tone that my 498T/496R simply cannot match.

This weekend, I will conduct more testing - at much higher volumes - and hopefully record some sound clips for you all to hear and enjoy.


Excellent report so far Robert. You have put a great deal of work into this journey. Tell your wife we thank her for her patience to allow you to spend so much time doing this for all of us.
 
Isn’t it heartwarming to see these kids discovering these things for the first time!

Well....I never needed pedals with my Marshall 2203 full stack, so I never really used them. In the studio, you use rack mount or effects in the DAW, so it's all new to me
 
Back
Top