Here's the real thing... 1971 SG Deluxe... Time Machine

Col Mustard

Ambassador of Perseverance
Country flag
Couple days ago, an old friend walked into my shop with a pair of guitar cases in his hand.
I've known this man for a long long time. I believe he saved my life back in about 1973 when
I was depressed and downhearted, hung down, brung down, strung out and stoned. Many of
the guys I knew in those days are dead now. Many never made it out of the Seventies. One went to Vietnam, and survived combat, and came home and partied himself to death.

Gene invited me to stay at his apartment, and I grabbed that like a life ring. He's a musician, and
I respected him a lot because he played jazz guitar as well as blues and rock an roll. He was in
Architecture school, and on his way to do great things. I was on my way to hell in a handcart, and
he got me on a siding so I could get my bearings and see an alternative or two.

I was so f*cked up, I don't remember what guitars he had then, but when he came into my shop,
he showed me a couple of them. Here's one:
upper bout@100.jpg
I believe this is a 1971 Gibson SG Deluxe, in totally pristine shape, brought to my camera by her original owner. I didn't ask Gene if he bought this baby new. But it seems almost like new. Feast yer bleary eyes
on this, me droogies...
body close@100.jpg
He and I worked together in a restaurant in like 1970-1972. We became friends by working well
together. After he saved my worthless life, I found a guy who owned a Fender Jazz Bass, and needed
money. I scraped together some cash and bought the bass, grabbing that like a spar from the wreck of
my life, and I stayed afloat. We played music together in a garage-band group called the Garbanzo Beans Blues Band. *laughs
controls close@100.jpg
I sort of remember him playing an Epiphone Jazz guitar in the band, and not this SG.
So when he came to see me, I was all over this guitar, loving everything I saw. I plugged it
in and played it... it sounds absolutely beautiful. It needs a setup, because he put it away
when he got into his Architectural career, and there it stayed. No mods, no damage, no cigarette
burns, the headstock has never been broken, it's as pristine a vintage guitar as I've ever seen.
body top view@100.jpg
ABR-1 bridge, screwed right into the wood, no bushings. Gibson brand Bigsby tail (prolly made by Ted McCarty's employees), witch hat knobs, prolly tar back p'ups (I didn't take Gene's guitar apart, he was allowing me to photograph it). The whammy bar works as advertised, and returns to zero.
Headstock@100.jpg
Headstock_nut@100.jpg
Headstock back@100.jpg
Look at this volute, and the wood grain of the mahogany, and the Gibson branded Schaller tuners.
I don't know if that's a bone nut, but I wouldn't be surprised. No binding, no nibs, no problem.
I dragged my 2012 SG special '70s tribute out and laid them side by side. Gene was very intrigued by
my "Tribute" guitar, and I was very intrigued by his authentic and extraordinarily lovely vintage Gibson.
Here they are side by side. My '70s tribute is not supposed to be a 'replica" ... its supposed to invoke
some of the mojo of the time period. This sounds like smoke and mirrors to me, but mine is an excellent
instrument in its own right, with a totally unique voice. So it stands on its own, seventies be damned.
pair 3@100.jpg

I just had a feeling you guys would enjoy seeing this. There aren't many 1971 Gibsons in the world that
are in as good shape as this one. Gene's taking it to Dave Collins of Ann Arbor Guitars to get set up and checked over. I can't wait to see it after that. AND play it. There's so much written and said about guitars
from this time period, much of it negative. After getting a real one in my hands, I can attest that a lot
of the Gibson bashing is similar to Gibson bashing of our own day and age... just blowing smoke.
Pair 2@100.jpg

Are we having fun yet?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing your memories with us. I had a 70-71 SG-250, so seeing these pic take me WAY back. I bought it new from the music store that I was working in.
 
Nice pictures Col. Dijon Mustard. It hardly has any bevelling at the horns. That SG looks pretty good considering it's age...the year I was born!


;>)/
 
Great story! And Oh dear lord what a Beautiful SG!!! I would love to get my hands on that if only for a moment!

So nice to hear that you and this long time friend still get together...
 
the looks of the binding near the nut makes me wonder if frets were replaced, and
the nibs removed. Maybe it's just old. what do you guys think? The bridge does
not lean or wobble, and it has not collapsed, like ABR-1s are prone to do. It does
not rattle. Intonation seemed very good to me, not precise but not bad.

The instrument is one of those made with no back angle to the neck...
so the fretboard runs parallel to the top of the guitar. I'd heard about those
but never even seen one, let alone got my grubby paws on it, and plugged
it in and put it through its paces.

This guitar plays and sounds lovely even coming outa hibernation with
old dead strings and needing some setup. I'll guess that my friend
never took this instrument to a real luthier before now. He likely just did what
most guitarists do, plug it in and play it. The neck is more narrow than I'm used
to, but the fingers find their way without fuss.

Back in 1973 there was no internet, no fora for posting anti-Gibson poison, there
was only "Guitar Player Magazine..." You could write a letter to the editor saying
how much you hated the changes to Gibson's SG design, and if you could actually
write English, they might actually print it. Pete Townshend probably did.

There were maybe two luthiers in Ann Arbor (which was remarkable).
Most players (including me) would buy a guitar and just play it.
Mod fever had not begun sweeping the country, and we just played what we had.
So Gene's guitar remains as it was. A remarkable find.
 
Last edited:
amazing guitar---and a great slice of Mustard .....history ....that is.

Very cool the friendship and the guitar :)

Your a lucky man Col.
 
Gibson engineers only made those guitars with no back angle for about two years in the early '70s.
The Norlin Corporation did a take-over of Gibson in 1969 I believe, and then they brought in MBAs and
efficiency 'experts' to figure out how to make more profit from the company. That was one of their
brilliant ideas... as was the SG with the control cover on the front, with all the electronic parts assembled
on it, Fender style.

Normal Gibsons have a back angle of about 4 degrees... whether they be Les Pauls or ES-335s or
SGs or what. It's one of the hallmarks of the brand, and is important to Gibson fans.
But it might be expensive to execute, which is why Fender never bothered. *grins
Leo probably looked at it and decided it wasn't necessary.

Anyway, Gibson's clients didn't care for this innovation, and it didn't sell well. I imagine my friend
as a young man, buying his first Really Good Guitar... so of course he wanted a Gibson SG. In those
days, players didn't fuss over nuances of tone between one type of hum bucker or another. There was
only one type of hum bucker: A Gibson Humbucker. Other guitars had filtertrons, or Fender Strat
pickups or P-90s or Mini hums. But if you wanted a guitar with hum buckers, you bought a Gibson, and you played
whatever they installed on it. I'm itching to know if Gene's guitar has T-tops or Patent Number pickups...
I was thinking early on that they might be Tar Backs, but now I believe those came later, like '72 to 73.

It's most likely that his guitar has T Tops. They sound absolutely beautiful to me. If it does, the
only way to really know is to remove the chrome covers and look. This ain't going to happen... at least
not on my watch. Because it makes no damn difference what they are! Should I repeat that?

I don't think that Gene's guitar is for sale. And I don't think he gives a mite what kind of pickups he has
in his old guitar. He's going to play it as it is. As he has always done. He's not enough of an idiot to
consider modding this instrument. It's got a great voice, and will be honored for its great voice, not compared
to something that it isn't. I was absolutely thrilled to play this instrument, and I'll be even more thrilled
to play it again after Gene gets it set up.

I'm going to attempt to talk him into coming to the studio with me, so he can watch while I screw something up
and then watch while I fix it. I'd love to record something using this unique instrument, and if Gene is willing,
I will.

Oh by the way, his other guitar that he brought in was a Kalamazoo made Epiphone Riviera... a semi hollow body
Jazz guitar with twin mini Humbuckers in it. It's quite similar to my modern day MIC Epiphone ES-339, except
that his is the real thing and mine is the replica. I'll do a complete study of the Riviera when he gets it back from
Dave Collins' shop.... if he's willing.
 
I also noticed the neck pick up is right up flush to the fret board compared to other SG's where the neck pup is a little distance away from the FB. You probably would get a warmer bluesy sound from that '71 SG.


;>)/
 
[QUOTE="Col Mustard, post:

It's most likely that his guitar has T Tops.[/QUOTE]
Being a '71 it is indeed most likely T tops. Really good pickups. Cheers
 
I also noticed the neck pick up is right up flush to the fret board compared to other SG's where the neck pup is a little distance away from the FB. You probably would get a warmer bluesy sound from that '71 SG.;>)/

Ya you betcha... I believe that the neck p'up on this guitar is right under where the two-octave harmonic would be...
So the designers who came up with this idea weren't wrong. It was a good idea. Here is the neck joint
that they used to accomplish this:
Neck Joint.JPG

look at the back of this lovely guitar:
body back.JPG
Now I KNOW that there is absolutely no tonal advantage to a one piece body over a multi piece body,
but this guitar has the elegance factor that has earned Gibson prestige over many years.
...This in spite of the wonky Les Paul pick guard and the lack of beveling and the front mounted control panel and the oversize headstock and the lack of back angle, this guitar was made by mostly the same group of expert craftsmen and women who made all of the fifties and sixties guitars people worship so much. It has a one piece body because it's a Gibson.

And in those days, there was probably plenty of mahogany left in the rain forests, and guys were still
able to find and cut large logs of it. Times have changed my friends.
 
Last edited:
I had a 1973 SG Deluxe for long enough to break it twice; once at the headstock and once at the heel. Your example is beautiful. Mine was quite handsome, too, with the ABR and the Bigsby and the beautiful walnut finish. But mine was pretty awful. I would take your Tribute, given the choice to play one or the other.

Other than not sounding very good, the narrow nut, tiny neck dimensions, and fretless wonder frets made it a not very good player. Bends choked out and fingers dragged on the fretboard itself. The zero neck angle looked bad and played bad. It certainly had/has a lot of mojo, but I will leave those guitars to someone else.

Love the witch hats on that one. Mine had black barrel knobs, which were cool, too. :yesway:

FWIW-I had a 1967 SG Standard in my possession for a few years which played and and sounded like a million bucks. Unfortunately, the real owner later refretted it with jumbo frets and let his brother use it to experiment with refinishing techniques. :shock: There were some later regrets, especially wrt the refin experiments. :facepalm:
 
Are ya'll sure there isn't, at least, some neck angle? I would think that if there was absolutely no angle at all the action would be unacceptably high by the time the strings passed over the bridge.

My '74 SG is built much the same way as the '71 and it is pretty flat...noticeably flatter than my 2014 SG. I could see someone feeling like my '74 has a flat angle, especially if they were used to playing other SGs. But, there is still a slight angle to it.

I mean, I've never held a '71, so I'm not going to insist dogmatically that there must be an angle to the neck. But, it seems there has to be somewhat of an angle.
 
Back
Top