Well, it might also be that guitars with walnut sides and back, and walnut fretboards and tusk bridge pins
and saddle, and tusk nut, & maple neck... such guitars might sound brighter than we'd expect... Since I never owned or played
or even ever saw a guitar with all these features, I really didn't know what to expect.
I just wanted to make it my own tone, what ever it turned out to be.
So that's one reason I went on at such length. I don't have a G-45, but mine is fairly close in construction.
Members of this forum often scoff at the concept of 'tone wood" when applied to electric guitars. Myself included. Because wood and bone and variants are not like, magnetic.
But in the case of acoustic guitars (and any other acoustic instruments, including pianos) tone wood is
everything. So it's worth considering. Before you spend a thousand on a guitar like this, you might want
to play one and see how it feels and sounds. But I wanted to describe the mellowing process I've been
able to witness since I took delivery of my beauty, which I named Zelda.
I don't know if Gibson actually makes
the best acoustic guitars... they certainly have seniority and have survived in a very competitive business... but Martin might win the prize in this category. Taylor is also giving all other makers a very strong kick in the behind, and could well be nominated in this contest. Lucky us that we have all these excellent makers striving for our loyalty, and our next purchase.
View attachment 31901
I enjoy living in a world where Gibson is possible, and where Fender and Taylor, Epiphone and PRS, Martin and all the others are able to survive and sell their fine instruments. I wouldn't want one to beat down the others,
I like diversity. And guitars with unique tone. *grins
Here's my pared down collection... to get here, I sold five others, and bought my J-45 so I
wouldn't cry too bitterly.
View attachment 31902