6CA7 in a Marshall DSL100HR. Worth Doing?

I used the 6CA7's from JJ in my JCM2000 DSL100. Loved them compared to the EL34's. Seemed to smooth things out just a little that worked for me.

I used JJ6CA7'S in my ORI50 and found them quite pleasing. Thump. Smoothed out the highs yet remained articulate while soloing. Fat yet articulate? Pretty good tube. And I'm not limited to low volume playing. Always into the power section. Loud and proud. Only cause it gets me off. Not cause it's cool...
 
I had an early 60's era Aussie made amp that used a duet of 6CA7's to output about 40 watts, one of several amps I regret getting rid of. A "clean to mild breakup" type amp, the 6CA7's really suited the design. Still had the original Sylvania output tubes (& Miniwatt pre's & GE 5AR4 rectifier) when I sold it mid 80's.
A bit of trivia, Eddie Van Halen used Sylvania 6CA7's in his Plexi for the recording of VH1. Cheers
It would be nice to be able to buy some new Sylvania 6CA7s.....
 
One US supplier that I use has matched duets of NOS Sylvania &/or GE 6CA7's available at $299. One thing to consider when considering new production vs NOS, & especially the cost difference is the tubes working life expectancy. New production power tube life is counted in hundreds of hours, whereas NOS power tube life is counted in thousands of hours, usually several of. Cheers
 
One US supplier that I use has matched duets of NOS Sylvania &/or GE 6CA7's available at $299. One thing to consider when considering new production vs NOS, & especially the cost difference is the tubes working life expectancy. New production power tube life is counted in hundreds of hours, whereas NOS power tube life is counted in thousands of hours, usually several of. Cheers

Yah but you and I are both watching that slip away. As time moves on.

At this point in time I wouldn't bother with those NOS prices. And a lot of them are ANOS. Meaning who knows what mileage they have.

However once the magic mattered. NOS was stout. Toneful. Dynamic.
 
And a lot of them are ANOS. Meaning who knows what mileage they have.

However once the magic mattered. NOS was stout. Toneful. Dynamic.
There are no doubt people who try to pass off used valve as NOS, but it's not a practice of the really respected suppliers. Their reputation is all they depend on, they are not going to risk ruining it for the sake of a fraudulent sale. Also, many of their customers are people who really quite well know the valve types they are buying. Cheers
 
There are no doubt people who try to pass off used valve as NOS, but it's not a practice of the really respected suppliers. Their reputation is all they depend on, they are not going to risk ruining it for the sake of a fraudulent sale. Also, many of their customers are people who really quite well know the valve types they are buying. Cheers

And you and me know those dealers. It's got thinner though. And prices higher.

I'm glad I got to hear the diff. Before we ran out.
 
So, you can swap EL34 for 6CA7 without changing the circuit?
A. you have to check the bias setting.
B. You can't swap the EL-34 for 6CA7 tetrode, in a Traynor amp or in a Peavey Windsor.
If you do that, you have to use 6CA7 pentode instead.
C. What we were talking about:
There is 6CA7 pentode, and there is 6CA7 tetrode. In some amplifiers the two are not interchangeable.
In other amplifiers like Marshall, they are interchangeable.

It would be wise to view the manufacturer spec sheet... to see if you are installing tetrode or pentode.

But no matter what amp, you should always check the bias and test the amp to make sure it's running correctly.
 
A. you have to check the bias setting.
B. You can't swap the EL-34 for 6CA7 tetrode, in a Traynor amp or in a Peavey Windsor.
If you do that, you have to use 6CA7 pentode instead.
C. What we were talking about:
There is 6CA7 pentode, and there is 6CA7 tetrode. In some amplifiers the two are not interchangeable.
In other amplifiers like Marshall, they are interchangeable.

But no matter what amp, you should always check the bias and test the amp to make sure it's running correctly.

Agree 100% on the bias checking/setting.

i asked specifically because I was curious about if it were possible to swap them into a Origin without resoldering????
 
6CA7 Original Tung Sol = Pentode

6CA7 Svetlana = Pentode

Sylvania 6CA7 = Pentode

Amperex 6CA7 = Pentode

JJ 6CA7 = Pentode

EHX 6CA7 = Tetrode

So as far as I can gather, the only vendor that is calling 6CA7 a "tetrode" is Electro Harmonix.

IMHO:
A real 6CA7 is a pentode.
The tube which EHX is selling ---- is not a real 6CA7.
It's a substitute which has been re-labled, and is not a pentode at all.
 
Agree 100% on the bias checking/setting.

i asked specifically because I was curious about if it were possible to swap them into a Origin without resoldering????

We don't know the schematic of the Origin.
But,
we do know that the only Fake 6CA7 is being sold by Electro Harmonix.

So as long as you use a non- EHX 6CA7 tube you are OK.
 
Last edited:
And you and me know those dealers. It's got thinner though. And prices higher.

I'm glad I got to hear the diff. Before we ran out.
Yes, yes, yes & yes. When some (maybe quite a few) of us were young, valves that are now very desireable & called NOS/NIB were current production.
Mullard ceased production of valves in the early 80's, of the other manufacturers around the globe, some earlier than this, some later. Luckily, valves were produced in very large numbers so some of them are still available to us, though the number of NOS available only gets less & prices only get higher.
6CA7 Original Tung Sol = Pentode

6CA7 Svetlana = Pentode

Sylvania 6CA7 = Pentode

Amperex 6CA7 = Pentode

JJ 6CA7 = Pentode

EHX 6CA7 = Tetrode

So as far as I can gather, the only vendor that is calling 6CA7 a "tetrode" is Electro Harmonix.

IMHO:
A real 6CA7 is a pentode.
The tube which EHX is selling ---- is not a real 6CA7.
It's a substitute which has been re-labled, and is not a pentode at all.
I've already spoken on the subject of what valve type a "true" USA produced "fat bottle" 6CA7 really IS, so the only reason I'm responding is that I like our TTR fellowship members to have the full picture & accurate information on given topics where-ever possible.
As I've never seen a Tung Sol (USA) or Ampere "fat bottle" 6CA7 I can't comment on them, but of the other old production data sheets that you linked, these are the "very source" of the mis-information (falsehood) that the "true" fat bottle 6CA7 is a pentode. If you look for discussion online etc regarding the "type" of valve a (true) 6CA7 is, you'll find mention of the fact that the data sheets do not give the full, accurate story in calling it a pentode & also showing it schematically incorrectly.

So once again, valves "types" are defined by the electrodes they contain.

A "Pentode" contains;
Cathode,
Control Grid,
Screen Grid,
Suppressor Grid,
Anode (plate).
It is shown schematically as this16190529289925786191566974392110.png
Below we can see the difference between a Tetrode & a Pentode. 1619054790847615435873434059612.jpg
The suppressor grid is a defining factor of a pentode. Note, the suppressor grid can be utilised in a number of ways & DOES NOT need to be at the cathode's electrical potential for the Pentode to properly operate as an audio amplifier (the suppressor grid can be electrically manipulated, thus is seen as a "seperate" electrode). Traynor amps utilities the EL34 pentode's suppressor grid in one of these "other" ways in not keeping at the cathode's potential.

A "Beam Tetrode" is a Tetrode that incorporates "Beam Forming Plates." It contains the following;
Cathode,
Control Grid,
Screen Grid,
Beam Forming Plates,
Anode (plate).
It is "correctly" shown schematically as this16190420152573531091456800448430.jpg
Compared to the Tetrode diagram earlier in this post, the beam forming plates are easily recognised. Note that in the diagram the beam forming plates are tied to the cathode. This is not the case in "all" Beam Tetrode's, however, whether the beam forming plates are internally tied to the cathode or not, they MUST be operated at the same potential as the cathode for proper operation (tied to the cathode "externally"). So the Beam Tetrode's beam forming plates CANNOT be utilised as a seperate electrode, unlike the suppressor grid of a Pentode. This is why a "true" USA fat bottle 6CA7 can't be just plugged into a Traynor amplifier.
Here is a cut-away view of a Beam Tetrode16190428922766841081076034327419.jpg
Note, NO suppressor grid (a defining factor of a Pentode).
Now here's a cut-away of a Pentode16190587108384344094386353625065.jpg
This time the suppressor grid is shown "externally" connected to the cathode. Remember, it does not need to be connected to the cathode AT ALL for proper Pentode operation.

So again we've defined the difference between a Beam Tetrode & a Pentode.
If you need "proof" that the USA made "fat bottle 6CA7" was in all fact a Beam Tetrode, & that the datasheets that refer to & show it schematically as a Pentode, do so INCORRECTLY, then get yourself hold of an old USA fat bottle 6CA7 example (can be well used, just not "failed") & carefully dissect it, then compare it's internal structure to the cut-away diagrams I posted above,,,, you'll easily see that they are in actual fact a Beam Tetrode.

Regarding the Electro Harmonix 6CA7 being the only new production 6CA7 that is not a real 6CA7 & being a Fake that has been re-labelled,,,, mate, before you come out with statements like this that are in complete error & pass it on to TTR members as gospel, do yourself a favour & get an old Sylvania, RCA or GE USA made fat bottle 6CA7 & dissect it. You'll see it is a Beam Tetrode, as per the diagrams above, as is the EHX 6CA7.

Regardless what one may think of Mike Matthews' (EHX proprietor) bussisnes practices, at least he had the foresight to somewhat reverse engineer "real USA fat bottle 6CA7's" before going into production of the Electrons Harmonix 6CA7, rather than just look at the (errornous) datasheets to see "oh it's a pentode" (which it freaking well ain't), then look back through Eastern Block pentode designs that they've previously produced to find one that they can adapt to call a 6CA7 (which is exactly what at least one of the "other" manufacturers you mention "did").
This is why the EHX is the only current production 6CA7 to even slightly reassemble an old USA fat bottle 6CA716186394118245089955221564650447.jpg
16190706886871813339575286688749.jpg
& is also the only current production 6CA7 that is a BEAM TETRODE, just like the old USA made 6CA7's were.

One thing worth mentioning, the Philips Mullard EL34 had a much greater input sensitivity than the fat bottle 6CA7.
What this meant was that the EL34 would overdrive much earlier than the 6CA7 & the EL34's overdrive characteristic up to full clipping (saturation) was gradual.
The onset of overdrive was much later for the 6CA7 & it's transition to full clipping much more abrupt.
The EHX 6CA7 has the input sensitivity of an EL34, so the overdrive characteristics differ from the old production USA fat bottle 6CA7.
Cheers

Edit:
Open up a USA fat bottle 6CA7 & you'll see something similar to this16190776384793067057771952851099.png
Here the (black) plate has been partially cut & opened outward. Looking closely, there is two wire grid structures, one inside the other. The "inside" wire grid is the control grid. The "outter" wire grid is the screen grid. The "beam forming plates" are the two silver sheet metal items on either side, partially between the screen grid & the black plate structure. Cheers
 
Last edited:
Back
Top