Some of us don't "tolerate" anything. We choose to play Gibsons because we feel they are the best tool for the job. Honestly, at this point in my life I am lucky, and I can thankfully afford to play whatever guitar I choose...and I choose to play Gibsons (at least the vast majority of the time - I do own other makes as well).
If they don't work for you, that's cool. But please don't keep perpetuating the myths about them being inferior or the company not caring about its customers. You can't make generalizations about a company based on a handful of individual bad stpries, and in my experience there are far more people that have had exceptional experiences, both with the products and the company/customer service, than negative. For some reason it's just become fashionable to bash Gibson on the internet, on this site and many others.
Let me put it another way: I've owned a ton of Fenders in my life and I have come to the conclusion that they are junk for the money they charge. I have a lot of reasons for believing this, but at the end of the day it manifests itself in me not buying Fenders. I don't spend my time bashing the company over it, I just don't buy them and leave them to those who like them. I don't want to be part of a internet-know-it-all negative influence that might stop someone from buying the guitar that will change their life.
Way more than a handful of stories...I am sad to say. Why do people try to make this sound like its two guitars out of 10,000???
I too am blessed to be able to play what I want...drive what I want...live where I want.
When I bought my brand new 2003 Gibson SG Standard in 2004, it buzzed and squealed so bad I could not perform with it. READ: I could not earn money with it. I returned it and bought a brand new Hamer Standard and began performing with it immediately.
No issues.
But, I wanted a Gibson. I grew up playing them and BACK THEN they could be purchased and deployed immediately.
From 2005 until 2016, I played an EMG equipped Schecter C1 Hellraiser. Never modified, it earned me a good living. That guitar has been played on more professional recordings than I can count...but I wanted a Gibson to serve me in like fashion.
In 2016, again I wanted a big Gibson tone for a recording project. I bought a 2016 Gibson SG Traditional. Same problems. In fact, if you cared enough to pay attention, I posted my 2004 email to Gibson's Nicholas Chemsak and it addressed the EXACT SAME issues I had with my 2016 Gibson SG.
So, I decided to buy a Gibson Les Paul. Started playing them. Saw high tailpieces, strings grooving the bridge, humps in the fretboard and binding, buzzing pickups scratchy pots and uneven frets.
So...with these experiences in mind, I find the same complaints hundreds of times online.
So, I figure buying a $4,799 Les Paul Custom will be a good option. Played three at three different locations....same issues I mentioned above.
So, it came to me that it would be foolish to buy a $4,799 Gibson and immediately embark on restoring it...although Gibson fans seem to accept this as normal...I do not.
So, I went to a fellow studio musician that i know, who is known for a particularly sweet sounding '59 Les Paul. I asked him how you get a good Gibson. He literally laughed and said, "Well, you spend a fortune on a relic that needs a complete rebuild, or you have a good one ghostbuilt that doesn't have all the problems associated with a 60 year old guitar."
It was then that I discovered that his legendary 59 Gibson Les Paul was a ghostbuild.
This conversation led me to Alex who built my Les Paul Custom Replica. The best part, for me, is I got a hand-built replica, with grease pencil under the pickups and a truss rod nut, but with features I couldn't get on a Gibson.
I've played Norlin-era Gibson's and I recorded with them. I grew up playing my Mom's 1979. They were good guitars, but you cannot buy that kind of quality today and I really see no reason to pay $8,000 to $15,000 for a relic that needs a total rebuild.
In talking with my colleague, he told me something interesting. Only a handful of Gibson's were good guitars. They are expensive. Rare. Highly sought after....and all Gibson's are judged by thid antiquated minority.
Charlie Daniels, Slash, Dickey Betts and several others play exact Gibson replicas. Why???
The design and tone of the Les Paul is remarkable. It is highly sought after. The tone is not necessarily a Gibson thing, but a Les Paul thing.
I couldn't buy a decent Gibson SG. My 1968 was a wreck. My 2003 and 2016 both had problems that would have required re-setting the necks to repair.
I played every new and used Les Paul I could find...then I had my replica produced...and it has everything I cannot get from a Gibson...plus I have been able to make it uniquely my own.
My colleague remarked..."its funny, you walk in with a $14,000 PRS and clients bitch about your hourly rate. Walk in with a 59 Gibson Les Paul copy and they treat you differently because they bought into the Gibson hype from the past and they really believe a 59 has some sort of mahical quality..."
I'm glad I discovered this anomaly before buying Gibson #4.
Now if...snd that's a huge if...a really nice Gibson crosses my path and it speaks to me, I would buy it. But, for now, all I care about is having the tone and getting paid to play.
We'll see what the future holds...
