Preference - Marshall JVM emulated out vs. Weber Mass Line out

[RVA]

I always thought that my recordings via my Marshall emulated output-mixer-DAW lost dynamics in both the high and low range, but especially the low end. Tonight, I hooked up the line out from ny Weber Mass 3 and recorded it bac to back with the Marshall emulated output. Which do you prefer, or is it too close to call?

Marshall v Weber(2)

 

[Inspector #20]

I always thought that my recordings via my Marshall emulated output-mixer-DAW lost dynamics in both the high and low range, but especially the low end. Tonight, I hooked up the line out from ny Weber Mass 3 and recorded it bac to back with the Marshall emulated output. Which do you prefer, or is it too close to call?

Marshall v Weber(2)

To my ear, the Mass has more articulation...more fullness...what's your opinion?

 

[eSGEe]

I agree---and like the Weber better---

 

[RVA]

Yep, the Mass, the second-clip, is much more articulate. The line out comes with a volume and tone knob (another thing the emulated out does not have). The tone was at about 1 o'clock. I am going to dial it back for more bass to get closer to the live tone.

Thanks guys!

 

[Inspector #20]

Yep, the Mass, the second-clip, is much more articulate. The line out comes with a volume and tone knob (another thing the emulated out does not have). The tone was at about 1 o'clock. I am going to dial it back for more bass to get closer to the live tone.

Thanks guys!

Awesome!