These Balckhearts have not been made for some time Chili. Also, other than the dent, this is in great shape, and it sounds awesome. If it was still in production, it would have been in the mail by now$9.50 SUX AZZZ. That is pittance for POOR ASS packing. Make him make good and an undamaged amp, take that one back for full refund including return shipping.
Have to wait to advise on caustic words or not.
So.
1- The amp sounds good.
2- The rip is on the back., and is now undetectable.
3- He gave you another 10% off.
4- Caustic and give you the money is better than nice and not.
5- Mesa tubes in there.
6- Should I keep going? I have several more.
Should we add 70 year old Texan to the list?
So skip the caustic reprint?
Yes, that is what I have it on and it is awesome, especially now that the speakers have broken in!I bet it sounds really good through that 10 X 12 cabinet.
That was the only reason I would do it, not for spite. However, since he has a 5 start rating otherwise, I will chalk it up to him having a bad day and let it go.Up to you.
...Unless you feel that by not posting the reprint you are setting other people up in some way.
If that is the case, you have an obligation to yourself to post it to clear your conscience and head.
70 year old Texan?
Was it Wade?
That was the only reason I would do it, not for spite. However, since he has a 5 start rating otherwise, I will chalk it up to him having a bad day and let it go.
Hey, where is Wade!?
He probably shot-up all his computers and smartphones. Can't post anymore. Wade: the Tobacco smelling Worm that Walks Backwards.Hey, where is Wade!?
He probably shot-up all his computers and smartphones. Can't post anymore. Wade: the Tobacco smelling Worm that Walks Backwards.
Administration should reach out to that crazy Indian. I miss him.
Done!Administration should reach out to that crazy Indian. I miss him.
Administration should reach out to that crazy Indian. I miss him.
Done!
Unfortunately, you are probably right. It was worth a try.This may prove ineffective due to the nature of the "reasons" for the exodus of a number of former contributing members.
Until those reasons are no longer in play, I am fairly sure we will no longer be seeing a number of members in here including Wade.
This may prove ineffective due to the nature of the "reasons" for the exodus of a number of former contributing members.
Until those reasons are no longer in play, I am fairly sure we will no longer be seeing a number of members in here including Wade.
Unfortunately, you are probably right. It was worth a try.