BlackSG91
Ambassador of Anarchy
I can SMELL the difference in a Hollow or acoustic over a solid for SURE--- no doubt hands down
;>)/
I can SMELL the difference in a Hollow or acoustic over a solid for SURE--- no doubt hands down
It doesn't take hours, at all. I've changed the pots in my semi-hollow Washburn in about 30 minutes, or less (not including the time to solder the components together outside the guitar). Build your harness outside the guitar. Then, run aquarium tubing from the holes for the pots, switch, and jack through the F-holes. Push the tubing onto the pot shafts, the switch (remove the switch tip), and into the jack. You may have to tape it onto the jack, as well. Then, gently pull the parts into position. It's not that tough, at all. You just have to be careful as you work the harness through the f-holes into the cavity.
******
Also, my "warmer"/"colder" comments aren't referring to your premise. Your expectation of the outcome may be correct. You were careful to use the term "audible" which is a good way to phrase it, because a real test may show there is a difference, though not audible to us...or it may show other things which I've already mentioned.
But come to think of it....conceivably, you can run your own listening test if that's the way you want to go. You have some Les Paul-style Agiles, correct? Anyway, take all those components out and install them in an ES-335-type guitar, and see for yourself.
Answering the initial question, yes I can hear the "hollowness" in a semi- or full-hollow. The attack is different and there is a little bit of a midrange attenuation vs a solidbody. You hear these subtle things when you play them and you end up playing them differently because of it.
I know the tonewood argument is ongoing. I fall squarely into the camp that believes that wood type and construction do make a difference. One thing I am absolutely sure of is that a Les Paul with a maple neck plays, sounds, responds very differently from one with a hog neck and no matter how you switch the electronics around they are going to retain their individual character. With a semi the difference is even more pronounced. How does the wood effect the tone? Don't know, don't care, but I can hear it and feel it so that means I can use it to make the noises I want to make.
Sadly for me, I think I am right on. This started with a desire to justify an ES335 guitar and the hours it would take to fish the pots out through the F-Hole for a mod. Unfortunately, I think that my premise stands intact - there is no audible difference, so why bother. Then again, that has never stopped me before!
I sort of have done this. I picked up my beloved CS336 and wanted to hear the soft whisper of the blues, but all I heard was '57 classics! They are not my favorite pups, but I want to keep this one stock because it was a gift from my parents.
View attachment 10062
That is a stunning guitar!
Most definitely a keeper.
but...
it is a different animal
from an ES 335/345/355.
You don't have an ES 335/345/355?
Go buy one.
Today.
Right now.
You can thank me later.
Don't like classic 57s?
Turn the dials on your amplifier.
or...
Buy a Supro Thunderbolt.
It will sound magnificent with your new ES 335/345/355.
![]()
Ma-HOG-ony."Hog Neck?"
No...thats Marketing....![]()
;>)/
No...thats Marketing....
"Hog Neck?"
I do so like 57 classics.
I never said I didn't like them.
2 of my guitars have them and
another has a 57 and a 57+.

Then why do you use an EQ pedal?;>)/
Bid is in a an Epi Dot. Blame/Credit goes to Tony for this one. The headstock is marked "USED", but that is fine by me. It has one of the nicest, simple, natural grains I have ever seenThat is a stunning guitar!
Most definitely a keeper.
but...
it is a different animal
from an ES 335/345/355.
You don't have an ES 335/345/355?
Go buy one.
Today.
Right now.
You can thank me later.
Don't like classic 57s?
Turn the dials on your amplifier.
or...
Buy a Supro Thunderbolt.
It will sound magnificent with your new ES 335/345/355.
![]()