Which is exactly why I have made a very verbose point in other threads about tests being done in a controlled environment with test equipment, and not just listening tests which are subject to the hearing abilities of individuals.
Such tests would demonstrate, apart from human biases, if there is a difference, and to what degree. If such testing indicates there is a difference but just shy of being audible, it may provide insights into ways to exploit materials and construction to carry those differences over the threshold to become audible. Or, such testing my indicate no difference, at all...putting the entire question to rest. Or, they may indicate there is a difference, but so insignificant as to be beyond usage.
*******
Now, because I think listening tests are flawed...I'm going to treat you to a ...wait for it... a listening test!!!
Yay!
This is just for entertainment and doesn't really prove anything, but it's kind of fun. The actual test starts around 8:00. I get a kick out of the Anderton's gear reviews and listening tests.
(As a bonus, at 20:12 they guess between Gibson and Epiphone!)
********
BTW, you're getting colder.
Don, I swear even despite 26 years since I owned my first guitar, my 1979 Black Les Paul Standard, I can still smell, feel and almost taste that guitar. If someone actually found it and a twin and gave them to me, I could possibly pick out mine.
Nope, they will all be different. But why should that matter for those who can hear the hollowness?SO Ray--- when will you be posting the 4 hollow V 4 solid test?
Will all have same scale length---brand and gauge of string --pickup configuration-- Using the same pick--all going to same amp on same settings recorded on same device?
So it is not my playing that stinks, it is my guitar...excellent!My 1974 SG smells different from any other of my guitars. The second I open the case, I can smell it.
It makes me wonder...(<---Led Zeppelin reference).
We smell because our olfactory organs detect the molecules in the air. So, if we smell something, we are inhaling it.
Maybe the finish of different guitars acts like a drug and makes us subconsciously play differently, affecting tone?
Now THERE'S a debate, right there!
(Adrian...take this and and run with it!)
Maybe we don't hear the "hollow". Maybe we smell the hollow!
*************
(No, I'm not serious!)
I can SMELL the difference in a Hollow or acoustic over a solid for SURE--- no doubt hands down
Sadly for me, I think I am right on. This started with a desire to justify an ES335 guitar and the hours it would take to fish the pots out through the F-Hole for a mod. Unfortunately, I think that my premise stands intact - there is no audible difference, so why bother. Then again, that has never stopped me before!********
BTW, you're getting colder.
This started with a desire to justify an ES335 guitar and the hours it would take to fish the pots out through the F-Hole for a mod. Unfortunately, I think that my premise stands intact - there is no audible difference, so why bother. Then again, that has never stopped me before!
I sort of have done this. I picked up my beloved CS336 and wanted to hear the soft whisper of the blues, but all I heard was '57 classics! They are not my favorite pups, but I want to keep this one stock because it was a gift from my parents.But come to think of it....conceivably, you can run your own listening test if that's the way you want to go. You have some Les Paul-style Agiles, correct? Anyway, take all those components out and install them in an ES-335-type guitar, and see for yourself.

I sort of have done this. I picked up my beloved CS336 and wanted to hear the soft whisper of the blues, but all I heard was '57 classics!
That's one beautiful guitar.I sort of have done this. I picked up my beloved CS336 and wanted to hear the soft whisper of the blues, but all I heard was '57 classics! They are not my favorite pups, but I want to keep this one stock because it was a gift from my parents.
View attachment 10062
