Tonewood

Man that black pick guard is the poop -----

So much cooler than white........
JB.jpg

Maybe I need a BLACK pearloid!!!!!!!!!!!! hhhmmmmm
 
BEst Fender Headstocks ever
GsFenderJazz.jpg

Sorry, I have to disagree. These are the best Fender headstocks ever...

gl_clf36290_headstock.jpg


...because they are on the best guitars Leo ever designed/built.
 
Last edited:
Thats a rather BOLD statement ----- especially since its NOT a Fender......tis a G&L.....

DO you HAVE a G&L Gball?
WOuld you like to send me your G&L for my Fender Jazz bass ------in a comparison testing study ---for a 2 month trial period?????
 
Thats a rather BOLD statement ----- especially since its NOT a Fender......tis a G&L.....

DO you HAVE a G&L Gball?
WOuld you like to send me your G&L for my Fender Jazz bass ------in a comparison testing study ---for a 2 month trial period?????

G&L is truly Fender. George & Leo = G&L.
Hate to debate you on this bro, But...
George Fullerton & Clarence Leo Fender.
Original & founders and keepers of the Fender flame.
Plus Fender was in "Fullerton" Ca.
Coincidence, Hmmmm. One needs to speculate on that.
I had a G&L ASAT, older U.S. made model.
Killer Tele style guitar. Ash body and all.
Only reason I don't still have it because I was offered a Mesa in trade.
What would Jesus have done...
Yep, He would have swapped too.

I think G&L Was more Fender than Fender was at that time.
Again this is just an opinion of a former G&L owner.
Tastes vary.
 
G&L is truly Fender. George & Leo = G&L.
Hate to debate you on this bro, But...
George Fullerton & Clarence Leo Fender.
Original & founders and keepers of the Fender flame.
Plus Fender was in "Fullerton" Ca.
Coincidence, Hmmmm. One needs to speculate on that.
I had a G&L ASAT, older U.S. made model.
Killer Tele style guitar. Ash body and all.
Only reason I don't still have it because I was offered a Mesa in trade.
What would Jesus have done...
Yep, He would have swapped too.

I think G&L Was more Fender than Fender was at that time.
Again this is just an opinion of a former G&L owner.
Tastes vary.
I love you, man... :H5:


Ok ok... I own a G&L, too... :victoire:

IMG_0031.JPG
 
Ol' Leo Fender never admitted to copying Bigsby's guitar headstock, even though they
knew each other and had dinners together with Les Paul himself, and maybe
some others, like maybe Ernie Ball. Leo said he got the idea from watching a touring
Romanian or Hungarian folk band, who played E. European traditional instruments
with that type of headstock. Do we believe him? Do we believe anything anymore...
brac.jpg bugarija croatia.JPG dangubica1.JPG
There are apparently a number of them, and that style is common enough not to be
anyone's property. Leo rightly figured it was fair game. If anyone had rights to it, they
would be very rich by now. Leo also had enough engineering know how to understand
what Robert wrote about the straight pull being an improvement. AND that the lack of
back angle and a maple neck meant a stronger headstock joint as well as more
economical use of lumber. (Gibson wastes a lot of mahogany cutting those one piece
necks out). But don't our Gibsons sound GOOOOOOOD... don't they just.

Funny, Humble Epiphone does NOT waste wood. My Epiphone ES-339 has a neck made of at least two pieces with the headstock glued onto the neck in what's called a 'Scarf Joint."
I've read posts by guitar tone purists who sneer at scarf joints as something that sucks tone, but I don't believe this. Mine sounds great, humble though it may be. Epiphone engineers
may be onto something, as supplies of large logs of "tonewood" disappear.

Guitar tone purists also sneer at bolt-on necks as something undesirable, but try and tell that
to a Strat player, or to a Fender bass player like me. We might whup yer ass up and down Broadway
with a Telecaster. Wood is like, not magnetic, man... My favorite straight pull headstock looks
like this: (very well made in Mexico, a replica of the Classic '72)
2 Headstock & neck@100.jpg
To me, it's an excellent look and an excellent design, even if it were under the
auspices of CBS Fender, it was still done by talented designers and engineers.
Works fine, sounds great, stays in tune like a champ... and the one piece maple
has a lot of visual appeal IMHO.

This Telecaster has awesome sustain, and great tone in its highs, mids and lows,
so I'm very attached to it. The notorious '70s "three bolt" attachment system with
its micro tilt adjustment also works fine IMHO. Set it and forget it. It seems quite
stable, well designed and works as advertised.
6e 3-bolt neck plate@100.jpg
oh yea, and I can upload one more pitcha maybe, just to t'row some glue in the sandbox,
but one of my other favorite straight pull headstocks (besides my legendary Fender J-Bass)
is this Epiphone Wilshire, originated in Kalamazoo Michigan by the same guys who built the
"golden age" Les Pauls and the Sixties SGs... czech this one out: Mine is a Chinese built
replica of the old 62s, but it's also a righteous guitar, after a few upgrades.
Skeeter Headstock 13@100.jpg
But hey! Look at the back angle on this baby... Right out of Gibson's playbook.
Headstock 02-14-12@100.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ol' Leo Fender never admitted to copying Bigsby's guitar headstock, even though they
knew each other and had dinners together with Les Paul himself, and maybe
some others, like maybe Ernie Ball. Leo said he got the idea from watching a touring
Romanian or Hungarian folk band, who played E. European traditional instruments
with that type of headstock. Do we believe him? Do we believe anything anymore...
View attachment 7065 View attachment 7066 View attachment 7067
There are apparently a number of them, and that style is common enough not to be
anyone's property. Leo rightly figured it was fair game. If anyone had rights to it, they
would be very rich by now. Leo also had enough engineering know how to understand
what Robert wrote about the straight pull being an improvement. AND that the lack of
back angle and a maple neck meant a stronger headstock joint as well as more
economical use of lumber. (Gibson wastes a lot of mahogany cutting those one piece
necks out). But don't our Gibsons sound GOOOOOOOD... don't they just.

Funny, Humble Epiphone does NOT waste wood. My Epiphone ES-339 has a neck made of at least two pieces with the headstock glued onto the neck in what's called a 'Scarf Joint."
I've read posts by guitar tone purists who sneer at scarf joints as something that sucks tone, but I don't believe this. Mine sounds great, humble though it may be. Epiphone engineers
may be onto something, as supplies of large logs of "tonewood" disappear.

Guitar tone purists also sneer at bolt-on necks as something undesirable, but try and tell that
to a Strat player, or to a Fender bass player like me. We might whup yer ass up and down Broadway
with a Telecaster. Wood is like, not magnetic, man... My favorite straight pull headstock looks
like this: (very well made in Mexico, a replica of the Classic '72)
View attachment 7068
To me, it's an excellent look and an excellent design, even if it were under the
auspices of CBS Fender, it was still done by talented designers and engineers.
Works fine, sounds great, stays in tune like a champ... and the one piece maple
has a lot of visual appeal IMHO.

This Telecaster has awesome sustain, and great tone in its highs, mids and lows,
so I'm very attached to it. The notorious '70s "three bolt" attachment system with
its micro tilt adjustment also works fine IMHO. Set it and forget it. It seems quite
stable, well designed and works as advertised.
View attachment 7069
oh yea, and I can upload one more pitcha maybe, just to t'row some glue in the sandbox,
but one of my other favorite straight pull headstocks (besides my legendary Fender J-Bass)
is this Epiphone Wilshire, originated in Kalamazoo Michigan by the same guys who built the
"golden age" Les Pauls and the Sixties SGs... czech this one out: Mine is a Chinese built
replica of the old 62s, but it's also a righteous guitar, after a few upgrades.
View attachment 7070
But hey! Look at the back angle on this baby... Right out of Gibson's playbook.
View attachment 7071

I always thought the Fender Stratocaster headstock was mathematically brilliant, but absolutely ugly.

And I never saw Bigsby's headstock until it was posted to this thread. Wow....

I used a licensed Fender Stratocaster headstock neck (made by B. Hefner) for my first 24.75" x 12.00" prototype. I think the old Fender headstocks look cooler and/or more sinister in all black...

Von Herndon Prototype Number 1 Headstock.jpg

I'm pleased with how our own headstock turned out. It retains the straight-pull concept but adds a certain "cool vibe" and it's not a knock off of another established design...

Von Herndon Headstock Patent Applied For Drawing-2.png

Von Herndon Custom-2.png

Von Herndon Neck Plans - 2.png

I have to admit I was really shocked to see Bigsby's headstock. I mean, that's like a carbon copy...I never knew about that...
 
But hey! Look at the back angle on this baby... Right out of Gibson's playbook.
View attachment 7071

There are many possibilities to make wood saving and strong headstocks with some back angle. And it is economically interesting to use them for budget guitars. If You ever come across a Vester Witch (935) bass - have a look at its headstock. The way they were saving wood is really impressive.
 
It's in the mail, from Beijing...
Where is my G&L??????

I have been waiting patiently..............................................I mean its NOT a FENDER no matter what you say--- because simply IT DONT SAY FENDER --- so BLAH and HUMBUG
 
Back
Top