Jethro Rocker
Ambassador of Live & Loud Action
Dunno.They went belly up, right?
Dunno.They went belly up, right?
First I ever enjoyed was this one. I think it was a bit odd. It kept wanting me to break out a bass and the Genz Benz cab.First Mesa I ever had the pleasure of playing.
I can’t get Chris Farley outta my head now!!!Go see Big Bob. He’ll set you straight.
Bob's voice? bdonI can’t get Chris Farley outta my head now!!!
His entire presentation about halfway through seems like a scene from “Tommy Boy”Bob's voice? bdon
I love me my Marshalls. I also play other stuff.
In terms of pricing, the Mesa stuff is ludicrously priced in Canada.
Peavey? Better price wise but ZERO, and I mean sero, support. Cannot even get parts. No one wants to handle it.
So...
Marshall isn't all that ridiculous price wise. The DSL ones are less than locally made Traynors.
I spose if one was on more of a budget it would make more difference.
I don't give a damn if I am almost 40 and I do have a great relationship with my old man.....I would like to see if this guy would adopt me or at the least, take a paternity test because I feel a strong bond here lmaoGo see Big Bob. He’ll set you straight.
I disagree on the Marshall's . This is where the hype should really be...
![]()
Sadly, it seems that Peavey has decided to go the route of "disposable" amplifiers. Those things used to be built for absolute durability (just look how many from the early days are still running strong) but now, just Chinese-made, price point stuff that's destined to fail early and so cheap you won't be inclined to spend the money to fix it anyway, just buy another. A lot of them sound great, some models World-class, but I don't think I would put my money into a Peavey any more.
I like the original Orange amps. They were more high fidelity, as the Hiwatts, Matamps, Simms-Watts and other high powered amps of that era. The new ones aren't the same, and don't really do anything for me.Oranges kick butt, but they are not the most versatile things, which is why I think they are not more popular. If you are playing Stoner Rock they are almost a requirement.
I disagree on the Marshall's . This is where the hype should really be...
![]()
To be fairHis entire presentation about halfway through seems like a scene from “Tommy Boy”
…to be fair.I like the original Orange amps. They were more high fidelity, as the Hiwatts, Matamps, Simms-Watts and other high powered amps of that era. The new ones aren't the same, and don't really do anything for me.
Oh yeah, those things just BARK at you, with lots of headroom. Not many amps around in that vein these days. A buddy of mine got a 100-watt Reeves and it more or less resurrected that kind of super loud/clean British-flavored tone but I can't think of too many that aren't designed to quickly push into some kind of saturation or distortion.
Modern Oranges are good for what they are but I find they are EQ'd way too dark for my taste, even ostensily clean, high headroom ones like the Tremlord. I need a bit more upper-midrange bite to be in my own sweet spot.
Oh yeah, those things just BARK at you, with lots of headroom. Not many amps around in that vein these days. A buddy of mine got a 100-watt Reeves and it more or less resurrected that kind of super loud/clean British-flavored tone but I can't think of too many that aren't designed to quickly push into some kind of saturation or distortion.
Modern Oranges are good for what they are but I find they are EQ'd way too dark for my taste, even ostensily clean, high headroom ones like the Tremlord. I need a bit more upper-midrange bite to be in my own sweet spot.

Yes , Bob at Big Bob's Marshall wherehouse. That is funniest video ever.Go see Big Bob. He’ll set you straight.
@67plexi, Think the caps are leaky yet on Hendrix's amp?How about Jimi Hendrix first Marshall amp 1966 JTM45/100 Ser# 7026
View attachment 88505
View attachment 88506
View attachment 88507