Gibson Custom Shop and Sweetwater Miss the Mark...

Indeed, it would be the end of them. And quality right now is as good as it has ever been, so that's become a non-issue with the new managment.

The more I think about it the more I think Amp Mad Scientist has a point and we are not getting the whole story.
Untitled.jpg
 
Indeed, it would be the end of them. And quality right now is as good as it has ever been, so that's become a non-issue with the new managment.

The more I think about it the more I think Amp Mad Scientist has a point and we are not getting the whole story.
For the most part I agree. The "And quality right now is as good as it has ever been..." part is debatable, and a the least not a good sign.

Sometimes they nail it, but I see far too many complaints and seen too many things myself. I hope they get it right ASAP. I would hate to see them decline more.
 
Did you notice at the beginning of the video that the guitar was a special order?
Then the guitar was deliberetly ordered
For the most part I agree. The "And quality right now is as good as it has ever been..." part is debatable, and a the least not a good sign.

Sometimes they nail it, but I see far too many complaints and seen too many things myself. I hope they get it right ASAP. I would hate to see them decline more.

It has to be.

Either somebody plugged the original holes...and refinished the headstock...

Or it was deliberately ordered without the tuners installed...

Or it's a fake.

Even if it "was" Grovers to start with...they would have used Gibson Grovers.
Which is completely wrong for a reissue.

1643335247643.jpg If Gibson installed Grovers they would have used Gibson Grovers.
 
Last edited:
This is the tuner which Gibson would have used to build a LP reissue.
Not Grover.
They're using Grovers on these...
 
Then the guitar was deliberetly ordered


It has to be.

Either somebody plugged the original holes...and refinished the headstock...

Or it was deliberately ordered without the tuners installed...

Or it's a fake.

Even if it "was" Grovers to start with...they would have used Gibson Grovers.
Which is completely wrong for a reissue.

View attachment 79488 If Gibson installed Grovers they would have used Gibson Grovers.

See Post 45 and follow the link. The tuners on the guitar are factory. Gibson F'd this one up. By the way I love Gibson guitars, but they have to own up to some sloppy QC sometimes...
 
See Post 45 and follow the link. The tuners on the guitar are factory. Gibson F'd this one up. By the way I love Gibson guitars, but they have to own up to some sloppy QC sometimes...
You dare question the idiot savant's scatter brained analysis?
:pound-hand:unthinkable.

Cigarettes, Coffee, Cannabis, Beer. The four basic food groups.
You wouldn't want me to walk around without eating breakfast? Don't be so cruel.

At Sweetwater:
there is a guitar tech, and there is a service manager that checks the work after the guitar is done.
At Gibson:
there is a builder, there is a set-up, there is a production QA manager inspector.

That's why I don't believe this story. Half the story is missing.
The facts don't add up.
 
Last edited:
I like my Gibson Custom Shop guitars they go up in value unlike most other brands.

My 1959 RI 335 was stock with grovers.

View attachment 79487

There is only 1 type of tuner I know of that doesn't use a screw.
It mounts in the same sized hole as the Grover tuner.
It's called a "ratio" tuner.
The base plate of the tuner holds the tuner in place without a wood screw.
The only thing that holds it on the guitar is the shaft nut and washer.

I think that if anything, the intention was to install ratio tuners that don't require wood screws.
 
Back
Top