eSGEe
Ferengi Ambassador of Trade
this---yes--more pl;ease send ithere NOW --like yesterday POST HASTE -- Sp8ctre will pay you via western union for 3 cheeseburgers on wednesday !
this---yes--more pl;ease send ithere NOW --like yesterday POST HASTE -- Sp8ctre will pay you via western union for 3 cheeseburgers on wednesday !
I've seen you post those on ST. I love them.I have a few working teles, plus one in renovation mode.
The Scrapcaster - homebuilt, set neck, stealth thinline cabronita-ish thing - came out of one of those TDPRI Telecaster build contests from 2012 or so, a few years back.
Builder was mad at himself. The first fret was mounted just a hair off on the Low E side. Said it bugged him every time he looked at it. Tunes up, plays and sounds just fine.
Hot liverpool pup, has a real airy/throaty quality. Doesn't really sound much like a typical tele should. He made the bridge out of heavy gauge diamond plate steel.
![]()
The Rockin' Sixty-Nine Rangecaster, contoured, stealth p-90, rail bridge, 4way tone machine - it covers a lot of ground
but again, doesn't really give up that true tele twang too easy. kind of stratty and pauly with the P-90 added
![]()
The Grüvcaster, fabric covered, plateflip, contoured 4-way tele - this thing should be in the dictionary, under the word twang. Sound like a tele is supposed to.
![]()

Those things are sexy. I have a friend that has a transparent blue one. I've been trying to talk him out of it for years.
I've never owned a Tele because there are some features of them that I don't really like - mainly the fretboard radius - but there are other things I do like, such as the looks and the bridge pickup. They are also pretty heavy. So when I saw this model I was very tempted. I might end up getting one at some point. They have some wood missing under that pickguard, that is apparently how they kept the weight down. I also like the contouring they did
The Black Pearl finish is also very nice:
I really like the swamp ash with the open pore grain
This one is 6 lbs, 13 oz. I don't think it's too heavy. And 9.5" radius works fine for me.I've never owned a Tele because there are some features of them that I don't really like - mainly the fretboard radius - but there are other things I do like, such as the looks and the bridge pickup. They are also pretty heavy. So when I saw this model I was very tempted. I might end up getting one at some point. They have some wood missing under that pickguard, that is apparently how they kept the weight down. I also like the contouring they did
The Black Pearl finish is also very nice:
I really like the swamp ash with the open pore grain


Radius doesn't bother me much one way or the other. Provided that the guitar is setup correctly, I can adapt pretty quickly (within a couple of minutes) to different necks.They are not too heavy. Some of the Teles with a 12" radius though are quite heavy, such as the Jim Root and John5 ones
I tend to prefer a pretty flat neck. I can play a 9.5" okay, the 7.25” radius though is totally foreign to me and I usually hand them back to their owner after fumbling around for a minute!
They are not too heavy. Some of the Teles with a 12" radius though are quite heavy, such as the Jim Root and John5 ones
I tend to prefer a pretty flat neck. I can play a 9.5" okay, the 7.25” radius though is totally foreign to me and I usually hand them back to their owner after fumbling around for a minute!


LOL.By the way, this is what the PT Special looks like without its pickguard. I guess you could hide an ounce bag of weed in there as long as you don't encounter any sniffer dogs
![]()
That's a funny lookin' little guitar.My Tele is 9½". Most of my Strats are 7¼". I just pick them up and play them, or play this
View attachment 50586
which reminds me that everything is relative.
![]()

LOL.
Fender made something similar in the late '60s. They came to be known as "Smuggler's Teles".