Ditto Chilli...That was my approach too.
Robert used his mind melt on me, and I thought too much about his past comments on each guitar.
Honestly, I was really super confident the modifications made to the Gibson SG were simply going to destroy the Squirecaster. I was shocked at how the Squirecaster sounded.
It's not that the Gibson SG doesn't sound good...actually, it does!!! I am really quite pleased with how the gibson turned out...but there is a certain something about the Squirecaster.
I think I can best describe it like this...
The Squire is dead-quiet. It has an almost noise-gated quality. The Gibson will buzz a little right in front of the amp, but not the Squirecaster.
The Gibson is a little harder to control at higher volume levels. It will feedback if you aren't careful, but the Squirecaster is much more manageable at high volume levels.
The Squire also has this snarl that I don't hear with the Gibson and harmonics just explode from it. I am sure the 10.6k of the VV Solo vs. the 7.93k of the GFS Classic II has a lot to do with that.
I play my Gibson often. It's really nice after the modifications. I'm a little disappointed it took so much work to get it there, and the frustration I experienced from three (consecutive) bad sets of Gibson pickups, but the SG is now a guitar that can actually be used in a recording environment.
The Squire has a very unique tone and I'm sure the Bill Lawrence treble bleed and 250k bridge tone control is a big part of that sound.
I haven't picked a favorite yet!!!