New Rehearsal Track/Demo We Created Today:

Inspector #20

Ambassador of Tone
Fallen Star
Country flag
One of my all-time favorites - Blue Öyster Cult's 'Burnin' For You.' This is a custom rehearsal/demo/performance track we 'built' for hire earlier today.

This is my first time engineering and mixing on my own. I would encourage you to read about the tune before listening to it.

So, we begin by loading the studio version of the song into the DAW and the drums are laid down to the original recording. The drums are miked in various positions, including both kick drums and ambient mikes above the drum kit hanging from the ceiling. The levels are adjusted on the console during a brief soundcheck. Once the drum tracks are laid down, they are re-mixed and finally mixed-down into (2) tracks - left & right - and panned out to 20% respectively.

After that, I usually throw down a scratch guitar and vocal track for reference. Then, on this project, I took over bass guitar duties and laid that track down. The bass is a split stereo track panned left and right at 0%. The bass is played more like a guitar in that I employ the higher register and apply more attack during the 'quiet' phase of the verse. Once the guitar kicks in, I pull the bass back to the lower octaves.

This is super noticeable and really gives the song a very unique feel as opposed to just being a carbon copy.

Next, I lay down a good rhythm guitar track, starting with - in this case - the lower octave. I used my 2016 Gibson Les Paul and my Blackstar ID-Core 100 watt 2X10 Combo. Gain was set to 1/2 on 'OD-2' and Bass was at 9pm, with Mids and Treble full up. The guitar tracks are all recorded totally dry with no effect other than the amp's overdrive capability. I deviated from the original arrangement because there are a lot of 'holes' (unplayed sections) in the original song. I created an almost continuous sonic assault which makes the song seem more powerful, IMHO. Next up is the higher octave guitar parts, which are laid down in a single track.

Next, we erase the scratch rhythm track(s) and duplicate the new rhythm track(s) Those four racks are now panned left and right at 60% & 80% respectively and volume is adjusted to balance everything that we have so far.

Next the lead guitar parts are recorded. Here is where I employed a really unique approach.

Starting with the first lead guitar phrase, I began picking each successive phrase harder and harder. The result is an almost 'wah' or 'phase' sounding effect. By the end of the song, the entire tonal quality of the guitar has changed and the volume levels have to be reduced to maintain balance. That's how hard the picking attack was. This was done throughout the song.

Lastly, the actual solo was performed. By now, I had been playing/working most of the day and I was on fire. I played the solo super-aggressively, with fierce attack and lots of pick harmonics.

Now, with all the necessary tracks in place, I start the mix-down process. First I balance all the individual tracks for volume until I can hear each and every track, even if it's subtle. Next, I flooded the right channel with delay at about 400ms with 4 repeats at +3.5Db. The left channel received a generous amount of reverb and these tracks were panned out to 100% left and right.

In the repetitive phrase that weaves in and out of the verse - played as a diad on the 'b' and 'e' strings only, I added a 'slap-back' delay of a single repeat at 125Ms, but only on the 8th successive phrase, which is single picked and dragged out a little. This gives that phrase a unique sounding slap-back effect, but it's subtle, so you gotta listen for it.

At the end of the main solo, I added a delay effect on the solo's final note set for 8 repeats at 600Ms. You can hear this on the left channel as it carries through the break.

The volume of all guitars is reduced by about 4.0Db behind the solo, but I try and shoot for a mix where you can still hear every track - and that's a tougher job than you might think it is. I also increased the volume on the rhythm guitar's last few phrases as it emerges from behind the solo.

You will hear a dramatic ascending phrase (F-E-F-G-E-G-A-G#-A) as the solo is ending (@ 3:22 - 3:24) the F-E-F-G-E-G is not part of the song's original arrangement, but something I added to punctuate the ending of the solo.

So, after a final volume check, I mixed this down to an MP3 and uploaded it so I can share it with all of you.

Backing vocals still have to be added, and we will likely get to that over the next few days.

Enjoy... :)

80 PROOF REDEMPTION - BURNIN FOR YOU - CUSTOM DEMO STUDIO PROJECT (NO VOCALS YET)
 
Last edited:
That was really good Robert. You are really hitting new levels all the time!

Thanks, Man...I am working almost everyday here of late. I am trying my best to absorb everything I can and learn to develop my ear from an engineer's perspective. Every project gets something special - not just ordinary, lifeless guitar parts - but something truly unique and special.

Backing vocals are the next step!!!!
 
Well that was spot on! It's like B.O.C. recorded it themselves! You did a great job of recording that tune...very well mixed. Is that a picture of your mixing board in the background on SoundCloud?


;>)/
 
Thanks, Man...I am working almost everyday here of late. I am trying my best to absorb everything I can and learn to develop my ear from an engineer's perspective. Every project gets something special - not just ordinary, lifeless guitar parts - but something truly unique and special.

Backing vocals are the next step!!!!

Engineering is like an art in itself...you have to have a good ear and comprehension. You're shaping your own sound and it's a rewarding task.:)


;>)/
 
Really well done Rob!! your work is outstanding!!!!! like I said before you are very talented. I know you have a good time doing these projects, keep it up.
 
On the one hand, the studio is a very sterile environment. You can do things in a studio that you cannot do live. I have always looked down upon that. Now, I have had to accept that and benefit from it it, instead of looking at it as a negative.

I am also running less and less gain on my personal projects now, whereas I used to keep the gain cranked on my own music projects. I am also using the tone knob more on solos and I find that by dialing up somewhere around '5' on my tone knobs, I can literally make a solo phrase sound like it was played on a different guitar.

I'm also pushing myself to strive less and less for perfection. I have found that my quest for perfection has imparted a sterility to my work. Much of what I am doing now would have been deleted just a few months ago - labeled as imperfect.

Now, as I listen to this track, I hear the metallic 'clanks' and unintentional harmonics, even notes that are not cleanly executed - all things that have always bugged me so much in the past - are now so much less of a problem to me.

I think I am learning more about myself as a musician than I am about the ins and outs of recording....
 
Last edited:
So, it’s like you’re playing Extreme Karaoke 80s edition...recording root tracks along with an original reference track, building your own version, piece by piece. That’s a good way to learn. I’ve done it a couple of times, for songs that I wanted to learn all the parts for, in the past. It’s easier than trying to tempo map a metronome for multiple time signatures, and tempos(which would sometimes be necessary with classic songs)...then playing it cold.
Good job. That’s one of the first songs that I ever wanted to learn all of the parts to. They all interact well with each other, remaining independent, while creating something whole. I had planned to revisit this song with the new bass. It is a fun bass line, and I know that I am way too rusty on the guitar parts.
If you want a vocal track, I should be sober until at least 6:30PM EST...I think that I might still know it well enough.:wink: I suck though.
 
On the one hand, the studio is a very sterile environment. You can do things in a studio that you cannot do live. I have always looked down upon that. Now, I have had to accept that and benefit from it it, instead of looking at it as a negative.

I am also running less and less gain on my personal projects now, whereas I used to keep the gain cranked on my own music projects. I am also using the tone knob more on solos and I find that by dialing up somewhere around '5' on my tone knobs, I can literally make a solo phrase sound like it was played on a different guitar.

The studio can be a good place/tool to figure out how to arrange in preparation for live performance.
 
So, it’s like you’re playing Extreme Karaoke 80s edition...recording root tracks along with an original reference track, building your own version, piece by piece. That’s a good way to learn. I’ve done it a couple of times, for songs that I wanted to learn all the parts for, in the past. It’s easier than trying to tempo map a metronome for multiple time signatures, and tempos(which would sometimes be necessary with classic songs)...then playing it cold.
Good job. That’s one of the first songs that I ever wanted to learn all of the parts to. They all interact well with each other, remaining independent, while creating something whole. I had planned to revisit this song with the new bass. It is a fun bass line, and I know that I am way too rusty on the guitar parts.
If you want a vocal track, I should be sober until at least 6:30PM EST...I think that I might still know it well enough.:wink: I suck though.
Everything he said is true, except the last sentence. That is a lie.
 
So, it’s like you’re playing Extreme Karaoke 80s edition...recording root tracks along with an original reference track, building your own version, piece by piece. That’s a good way to learn. I’ve done it a couple of times, for songs that I wanted to learn all the parts for, in the past. It’s easier than trying to tempo map a metronome for multiple time signatures, and tempos(which would sometimes be necessary with classic songs)...then playing it cold.
Good job. That’s one of the first songs that I ever wanted to learn all of the parts to. They all interact well with each other, remaining independent, while creating something whole. I had planned to revisit this song with the new bass. It is a fun bass line, and I know that I am way too rusty on the guitar parts.
If you want a vocal track, I should be sober until at least 6:30PM EST...I think that I might still know it well enough.:wink: I suck though.

EST??? I am surprised your drinks have not all frozen solid back there!!!!!!

I'm still new to this entire process, so what I am sharing is out of sheer wonder and amazement and not any sort of tutorial. I want to make sure that comes across the right way from the get-go.

I was surprised that so many demos that get produced in a studio - that includes rehearsal tracks and even performance/accompaniment tracks - begin as a 'play along' to the original version. This is what I found out, as you can imagine I am an endless questions type of guy.

Time is money is nowhere more true than on studio time. The biggest, most time consuming and most daunting projects are the original songs. Many times, a writer will come in with sheet music (i can't read music - only bits and pieces) and it's a very simple process. Most of the time, they come in with nothing more than a guitar & vocal concept on CD. Even more time consuming is when they come in with a guitar and play & sing their song. From that, it has to be listened to, transposed, even sometimes the arrangement will need to be changed, and time signatures may need to be reworked. In some cases, the artist/writer will be sent away with a list of corrections and they come back when it's 'right' so to speak. Depending on the budget, sometimes the CD gets dropped off and the work begins. I've worked on a lot of Spanish language music - which is a huge thing here in this area - and some of those projects are the toughest of them all.

So, when we are asked to create a demo/rehearsal track, which involves and already published work, we have a couple of approaches. In some cases, we have pulled some musicians together to form a 'studio band,' run through a song a couple of times, then record it in a single take. Sometimes we will augment an existing band by replacing a missing member for the purposes of finishing a recording. Everyday it's something different. Some times, a clienet will request a complete song, less lead vocals, with a stipulation for it to sound "just like the record." No room for artistic expression on those projects.

Laying down the basic tracks, along to the original recording, is a time-saving method more than anything else. Your time signatures are written in stone. There are no re-takes because the drummer missed a beat - or started us off too fast - it's consistent and it's fast. From just the basic drum track, the project can be moved along to another step in the creation process. Some artists/bands just come in and request the drum tracks only and they build a song from that, whether its an original or an established work. I have seen drummers walk in with a piece of original sheet music, put on headphones and drum out a perfect track to a metronome click track in a single take. But on an established work, it's really fast to just have the engineer run the CD and lay down the instruments.

Now, the biggest concerns are - of course - licensing. In the past, the studio did not have to seek permissions to create a copy of an established work because they were not performing it publicly. Now this appears to be changing. For years Harry Fox Agency, CD Baby, Make-It-In-Music, (or CCLI in the case of religious music) was used to obtain licensing of established works for 'covers' and performance permissions where a fee is charged for entry to a venue and/or for the sale of copyrighted material. Now, the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA), the Music Publishers’ Association of the United States (MPA), plus ACAP, SESAC and BMI are getting involved in a move that appears to be aimed towards requiring any recording of an established/published work - even in a studio setting - to require special licensing.

Not sure how that will impact the process of creating rehearsal/performance tracks of established works, but it's certainly interesting...
 
The studio can be a good place/tool to figure out how to arrange in preparation for live performance.

Probably the best point of all. Everything I am doing is aimed towards preparing myself to front my own band... :)

A musical friend of mine recently left what I would describe as a 'killer cover band' and started doing acoustic only performances, like a wineries and small clubs. When asked why, he related that the musicians were 'flaky' and that there were instances where good songs (that the band sounded polished on) were dropped in favor of a different song that they didn't play/sing well.

He is making more on his own and he says he doesn't have to argue with anyone if he needs to tune to Eb for a particular song.
 
And now, to reveal a huge 'easter egg' on this track...the main solo...and outtro parts....I played on the Von Herndon Double Neck with the guitar tuned a half-step down. This required re-transposing the solo because of the key change, but the feel and tone of the .009 x .046 strings at Eb really felt/sounded amazing. The guitar was just so much easier to play!!! Some of that must be the reduced string tension???

Could the Kevin Taylor Erupter have something to do with the tone???

IMG_20180429_56955.jpg

IMG_20181011_55458.jpg
 
Back
Top