I feel any band that has longevity, regardless of their genre, is going to evolve. It’s inevitable. True fans of that band will go with it. Casual fans will do nothing but complain about how they sounded better 10 years ago and diss the current stuff.It would not be the point that I would recommend someone getting into Rush start at. Some of the mid-career albums are definitely an acquired taste - all are good in their way but not necessarily the stuff that defines the band to the vast majority of fans.
I feel any band that has longevity, regardless of their genre, is going to evolve. It’s inevitable. True fans of that band will go with it. Casual fans will do nothing but complain about how they sounded better 10 years ago and diss the current stuff.
I won’t use Metallica as an example.
Oh…. I knew what you were saying. I was a late bloomer when it comes to Rush. Never disliked them, just wasn’t in to them enough to buy albums. Then while I was laid off in 2009, found a cable channel that played live rock concerts. Saw a couple from Rush as well as KISS. Game changer for me.I have never had an issue with their evolution. I am very much a fan of their later work (Snakes and Arrows is my favorite Rush album of all for example). But, I will say there are some albums in the mid-life of the band (Power Windows, Hold Your Fire, Presto, Roll The Bones) that perhaps do not showcase their strengths as much as the earlier and later albums. Those are fine albums in their own right, but again, I wouldn't recommend those to get a taste of the Rush experience any more than I would recommend the first album, which is possibly even more of an outlier.
I get that gball, I started pretty much at the beginning of the catalog and followed most of the way through to mid point as this is an album that is more commercially appealing.I have never had an issue with their evolution. I am very much a fan of their later work (Snakes and Arrows is my favorite Rush album of all for example). But, I will say there are some albums in the mid-life of the band (Power Windows, Hold Your Fire, Presto, Roll The Bones) that perhaps do not showcase their strengths as much as the earlier and later albums. Those are fine albums in their own right, but again, I wouldn't recommend those to get a taste of the Rush experience any more than I would recommend the first album, which is possibly even more of an outlier.
Rush is the band that is for musicians . The complexity and of course Geddy’s shrill voice had people running sometimes in the other direction. lolIt’s not my favorite album, but Presto is the tour where I started going to see Rush tour regularly…like…every time they came to the Boston area…up to their “retirement tour” after Clockwork Angels”(iirc).
I did take a listen. First…. Neil Peart was very good at what he did. Second…. The LP with the Piezo is an awesome guitar. So many options available to Alex when he’s playing that one.@iblive Listen to the tittle track Presto and The Pass. Listen very intently and report back.lol
Clockwork would be one of the studio albums I have. It’s a decent album. Different. But good.Rush is the band that is for musicians . The complexity and of course Geddy’s shrill voice had people running sometimes in the other direction. lol
I need to sit down with Clockwork Angels, I never gave it a chance.
That’s funny, I like Geddy’s keyboard work but many people do not.
Me either. I just marvel at how he can juggle playing bass, then with bass hanging around his neck play keyboards.... switch back and forth seamlessly... all the while playing the synth floor pedal that they use at times. Dudes pretty good.That’s funny, I like Geddy’s keyboard work but many people do not.
I absolutely agree, I like to hear the other opinions. So many fans, it’s crazy.My favorite Rush album was their first one. It was raw and natural. I like most of their albums and would listen to any of them. I would and did not buy all of them. I've seen Rush many times since their first album and would see them again if given the chance. Also, being afraid to express your opinion on Rush albums or anything is not smart even though no one person's opinion is more relevant that another. I like hearing other people's opinions even though I might not agree or have a different opinion. Do not be like Bill.
Neal was in a class of his own as far as drummers. One of the best all time. I picked the first album because I'm a guitarist and love the raw unrefined sound from their early stuff. This is the same with all the old bands. Most of the music released today has been ultra produced, reproduced and refined in the studio. It sounds great on my stereo and I like it, but I still prefer hearing a band as they really are even with the occasional missed notes. I see bands now and they have computer driven sound clips or recordings playing in the background to make them sound better. Maybe I'm just old but that's just my opinion. I feel lucky that I got to see Rush so many times in their prime days.I absolutely agree, I like to hear the other opinions. So many fans, it’s crazy.
I do like the first album a lot.
Some people write it off, I guess because Neil was not involved but I think it’s a great album.
Of course I like Neal for lots of reasons.
Besides the fact he could keep a decent beat (wink) lyrically he was so on the edge for me, something that I really relate to.
There are a handful of full of writers I like.