50's vs. Modern Wiring

I'll probably put in an order at Stewmac for something similar. .22uF ones.

Maybe look @ the Russian mil surplus caps on ebay. They're cheap & I'd imagine there's plenty over by you so shipping should be very reasonable.
 
Has anyone ever tried the Black Rose wiring mentioned? I can't find much on the web about it.
Yes, I have, & most people probably have without knowing it, regardless of the pickup & control configuration. Most modern guitars use this scheme. Ibanez always have. Hold on a sec & I'll go & check my Jackson. Yep, same scheme of connecting the single volume & tone control. Cheers
Edit; I should add, it is called "black rose" wiring because (I think) Rose custom guitars started using the same scheme that is used in all Ibanez's etc in Gibsons. It was to overcome the treble loss of Gibson's modern scheme when turning the volume down & also to overcome the interactivity of the volume & tone inherent to the 50's wiring scheme. Cheers
 
Last edited:
The Modern, 50s, "Black Rose" and single 50s wiring diagrams in this thread are great!

I just got a Chinese epi '55 LP with surprisingly nice Gibson p90s. Now I see it came with the 50s style wiring— so no doubt that has something to do with how tonefully usable the full-size pots are on this guitar. I cleaned up the control cavity a little bit when I put in some old Bumblebee caps I got from my Los Alamos Labs mad-scientist neighbor.

I found out that two of the pots are 500k, one is 460k and one is 520k. I used the 520k on the neck volume and the 460k on the bridge volume. I spaced and forgot to check each pickup's DC resistance while everything was disconnected, but I understand that they are the same. I like that they don't sound ONLY overwound/muddy. I get lots of clarity and bright tone when I want it.

I had to drill a 4" x 1/8" hole to route an extra ground wire to the strings because I took off the tail-piece and installed a B7 Bigsby.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The Modern, 50s, "Black Rose" and single 50s wiring diagrams in this thread is great!

I just got a Chinese epi '55 LP with surprisingly nice Gibson p90s. Now I see it came with the 50s style wiring— so no doubt that has something to do with how tonefully usable the full-size pots are on this guitar. I cleaned up the control cavity a little bit when I put in some old Bumblebee caps I got from my Los Alamos Labs mad-scientist neighbor.

I found out that two of the pots are 500k, one is 460k and one is 520k. I used the 520k on the neck volume and the 460k on the bridge volume. I spaced and forgot to check each pickup's DC resistance while everything was disconnected, but I understand that they are the same. I like that they don't sound ONLY overwound/muddy. I get lots of clarity and bright tone when I want it.

I had to drill a 4" x 1/8" hole to route an extra ground wire to the strings because I took off the tail-piece and installed a B7 Bigsby.
Welcome to TTR... :cheers:

Oh boy.... fresh meat... :sneaky:
 
I didn't know that Gibson used the "Modified Modern" (aka Black Rose) scheme at all, but it seems that this is the way that "two P90" guitars are being wired. Not sure how long they've been doing this as I know originally two P90 guitars used the vintage or 50's scheme. Here's the cavity of my recently acquired 2010 50's tribute LPWP_20180624_001.jpg
As you can see it appears stock & uses the Black Rose scheme. I looked into it as, although happy with the guitar as a whole, I don't like the way the controls act, especially so in the "in between" position. Looking online it seems most all diagrams show two P90's wired this wayV__65CC.jpg
Another thing is Gibson used 300k volume pots (again. My 3 Gibson's came with 300k volume pots). I have two CTS 500k Linear pots ordered, along with a sheet of conductive adhesive copper foil (I have the copper ribbon already) to shield it with. I prefer Linear volumes as I get more useable range with them. Before installing I open the pots & carefully shave the outer edge of the carbon resistive element (down near the "0" end) to bring them up to 500k as most meter a bit low I find. I have K40Y-9 paper in oil caps, 0.015uf for the neck & 0.022uf for the bridge (that meter correctly) to go into it, 50's wiring of course. Cheers
 
Last edited:
As you can see it appears stock & uses the Black Rose scheme.
Hey Ivan... there's a slight variance to the connection of the cap in the Black Rose scheme on the following illustration. Do you think it would make a difference compared to your pic?

wiringBlackRose.jpg


I'm posting the Modern and 50's style wiring for reference:

wiringModern.jpg

wiring50s.jpg
 
I like the 50'S blend controls middle switch. My 2001 Custom Shop Les Paul's.

View attachment 16063 View attachment 16064


A feature I also like. With the Black Rose scheme they still blend somewhat, but its not at all like the 50's scheme. My two humbucker Jackson has a master volume & tone & its the only thing I don't like about the guitar. I'm seriously thinking about removing the master volume & tone controls, plugging the holes & drilling for a 2 volume 2 tone configuration (50's scheme of course). So much more versatile setup. I'll need to use (Bourns) mini pots to position them properly in the cavity. Cheers
 
Hey Ivan... there's a slight variance to the connection of the cap in the Black Rose scheme on the following illustration. Do you think it would make a difference compared to your pic?

View attachment 16069


I'm posting the Modern and 50's style wiring for reference:

View attachment 16070

View attachment 16071

No, no difference. The diagram I posted earlier & the one you posted above have the tone caps grounding in a different place is all, but ground is ground either way, so its still the same circuit. Cheers
 
Thanks, Ivan. Until today, I wasn't aware of the Black Rose wiring style. I'm going to have to try it.

No problem, glad I could help clear it up. The Black Rose type tone setup is common in many guitars, whether 2 vol/2 tone,,, master vol/master tone,, 1 vol/2 tone etc. Ibanez, Jackson, Squier & many others connect the tone cap this way so chances are you've already experienced it.
Yes, I wonder where Biddlin is. Sure hope he's ok. Cheers
 
Hmmm....I think most of my stuff is 50's style. When I started out, I had Tone Man do all my harnesses.

IMG_20180421_56408.jpg

I did my own harness on the VH Double Neck, but its odd in that it has two separate harnesses and only a master volume and tone for each pair of SLE-101's so i'm not sure what style this wiring really is????

IMG_20180127_15590.jpg
 
Back
Top