Ha ha... that's right! Once I saw the pic of the Firebird X, I closed my mind...A closed mind is nothing to be proud of...

A closed mind is nothing to be proud of...
To me, this is an interesting design, and the only thing I don't like about it is the price.
If they offered this for $1100, (and I don't understand why they couldn't) this thing would
have much more appeal to me. If I saw a used one for $750 I'd be intrigued, and would
want to try it out.
Maybe I get tired of seeing all the same designs over and over. The firebird tone is a classic in its
own way, but I've never cared for that body shape. So to my mind, this design is a lot more accessible
way to get the Firebird tone. I don't think body shape has any effect on tone. *grins
When I see those three mini hums, I think of the music of Johnny Winter. I like the maple neck.
Has anyone who has posted in this thread ever actually played a Firebird X?
Just wondering.
I have not.
A remnant of Hank J's obsession with advancing the "technology" of the electric guitar and attempting to dictate to guitarists what they wanted instead of asking them what they wanted.
Thankfully, he seems to have mostly learned the lesson that this experiment provided him and he is mostly giving us the products we are asking for now.
I'll start to believe that when I can buy an HP fret over binding no nibs guitar without having the added price & inconvenience of a gimmicky automatic G-Force tuner attached to that new guitar purchase!
I did say "mostly"
I don't understand how those things are still standard on the HP's, but...what do I know?
I did say "mostly"
I don't understand how those things are still standard on the HP's, but...what do I know?
If you only knew what that white Firebird does to me...